StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Howitzer vs TestNG

Howitzer vs TestNG

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestNG
TestNG
Stacks1.2K
Followers198
Votes0
Howitzer
Howitzer
Stacks1
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars259
Forks27

Howitzer vs TestNG: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Howitzer is based on the Page Object Model design pattern, focused on creating reusable and maintainable page objects for test automation. TestNG is a testing framework that provides functionalities for testing different types of test cases including unit, functional, and integration testing.
  2. Reporting: Howitzer provides user-friendly HTML reports that include detailed information about test execution, screenshots, steps, and assertions, making it easier to analyze test results. TestNG also generates detailed HTML reports, but they are more focused on test case results rather than test execution steps.
  3. Documentation: Howitzer emphasizes on providing detailed documentation on how to use the framework, including guides on creating page objects, writing test cases, and running tests. TestNG also offers documentation, but it is more generic and focused on the framework's functionalities without specific usage guides.
  4. Browser Support: Howitzer supports parallel test execution across different browsers and platforms using Selenium Grid for cross-browser testing on multiple environments. TestNG does not provide built-in support for cross-browser testing, requiring additional plugins or configurations for running tests on different browsers.
  5. Integration: Howitzer can be easily integrated with Continuous Integration (CI) tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo for automating test execution and generating reports. TestNG can also be integrated with CI tools, but the configuration and setup might require more manual effort compared to Howitzer.
  6. Community Support: Howitzer has a smaller user community compared to TestNG, which is widely used in the automation testing industry, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and solutions for common issues. TestNG has a larger user base and active community support, with a range of plugins and extensions available for enhancing test automation capabilities.

In Summary, Howitzer and TestNG differ in their architecture, reporting capabilities, documentation, browser support, integration with CI tools, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestNG
TestNG
Howitzer
Howitzer

It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.

It uses the best practices and design patterns allowing to generate a test project in less than 5 minutes. It has out-of-the-box configurations for parallel cross-browser testing in the Cloud.

Support for data-driven testing ; Support for parameters; Powerful execution model (no more TestSuite); Supported by a variety of tools and plug-ins (Eclipse, IDEA, Maven, etc
Independent; Fast; Elegant; BDD tool; Easier Support; Test against browserless drivers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
259
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
27
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
1
Followers
198
Followers
1
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
Rake
Rake
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Web Starter Kit
Web Starter Kit
Mailgun
Mailgun
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
RuboCop
RuboCop
Cucumber
Cucumber
Ruby
Ruby
CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting

What are some alternatives to TestNG, Howitzer?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana