Overview

MultiChain

Stacks13

Followers31

Votes4

Hyperledger Fabric

Stacks112

Followers138

Votes8

GitHub Stars16.4K

Forks9.1K

Hyperledger Fabric vs MultiChain: What are the differences?

Hyperledger Fabric vs MultiChain

Hyperledger Fabric and MultiChain are two popular blockchain frameworks that offer different features and capabilities. Here are the key differences:

Consensus Mechanism: Hyperledger Fabric supports multiple consensus mechanisms such as Kafka, Raft, and Solo, allowing participants to agree on the ordering and validity of transactions. On the other hand, MultiChain uses a simpler consensus algorithm based on mining, similar to Bitcoin.
Permissioned vs Permissionless: Hyperledger Fabric is a permissioned blockchain framework, which means that participants need to be authenticated and granted access to the network. MultiChain, on the other hand, can be used for both permissioned and permissionless blockchains, giving users more flexibility in choosing their network setup.
Smart Contract Language: Hyperledger Fabric uses a more flexible and widely-used smart contract language called Chaincode, which can be written in programming languages like Go, Java, and JavaScript. MultiChain, on the other hand, uses a simpler native smart contract language that is less versatile but easier to use.
Interoperability: Hyperledger Fabric is designed to be highly interoperable with other systems and supports integration with various databases and external systems. MultiChain, while also providing basic interoperability features, may be less extensive in terms of integration options.
Private Data: Hyperledger Fabric offers a robust private data feature, allowing certain data to be kept private and only shared with authorized participants. MultiChain also supports some form of confidentiality through encryption, but it may not have the same level of granularity and control as Hyperledger Fabric.
Governance Model: Hyperledger Fabric has a more formalized governance model with a set of defined roles, permissions, and policies that govern the network. MultiChain, on the other hand, provides a more flexible approach to governance, allowing users to define their own rules and consensus mechanisms.

In summary, Hyperledger Fabric offers more flexibility in consensus mechanisms, supports a wider range of smart contract languages, and provides stronger privacy and governance features compared to MultiChain. MultiChain, on the other hand, offers the option for both permissioned and permissionless blockchains, simpler integration, and a more customizable governance model.

🔥 Trending in Databases on StackShare

pgvector Databases

Open-source vector similarity search for Postgres

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

189

7

Detailed Comparison

MultiChain	Hyperledger Fabric
It is a platform that helps users to establish a certain private Blockchains that can be used by the organizations for financial transactions.	It is a collaborative effort created to advance blockchain technology by identifying and addressing important features and currently missing requirements. It leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system.
Smart contracts are not needed; Flexible asset metadata; Permissioned follow-on issuance; Atomic multi-asset payments; Multi-way atomic asset exchanges; Multi-signatures for security and escrow; Subscribe to an asset to query transactions.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 16.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.1K
Stacks 13	Stacks 112
Followers 31	Followers 138
Votes 4	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 No Transaction Fees	Pros 3 Highly scalable and basically feeless 2 Flexible blockchain framework 2 Higher customization of smart contracts 1 Easily to developmenet
Integrations
C++ Python Golang Rust Wagyu	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to MultiChain, Hyperledger Fabric?

Ethereum

A decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Tendermint

It is a software which can be used to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in any distributed computing platforms. It consists of two chief technical components: a blockchain consensus engine and a generic application interface.

IPFS

It is a protocol and network designed to create a content-addressable, peer-to-peer method of storing and sharing hypermedia in a distributed file system.

Web3j

It is a lightweight, highly modular, reactive, type safe Java and Android library for working with Smart Contracts and integrating with clients (nodes) on the Ethereum network. This allows you to work with the Ethereum blockchain, without the additional overhead of having to write your own integration code for the platform.

Ripple

It is an open source protocol which is designed to allow fast and cheap transactions.

BigchainDB

It is designed to merge the best of two worlds: the “traditional” distributed database world and the “traditional” blockchain world. With high throughput, low latency, powerful query functionality, decentralized control, immutable data storage and built-in asset support.

Eris

It is free software that allows anyone to build their own secure, low-cost, run-anywhere applications using blockchain and smart contract technology.

Litecoin

It is a peer-to-peer Internet currency that enables instant, near-zero cost payments to anyone in the world. It is an open source, global payment network that is fully decentralized without any central authorities.

Decentralized Internet

A library and SDK built for building decentralized web and grid computing projects.

Parity

Blockchain Infrastructure for the Decentralised Web From the Substrate blockchain framework to Polkadot, the sharded protocol enabling blockchains to operate seamlessly together at scale, Parity builds the foundation of Web 3.0.