Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS WAF vs Imperva: What are the differences?
Introduction
Here we will compare AWS WAF and Imperva to highlight their key differences.
Deployment Model: AWS WAF is a cloud-based web application firewall service provided by Amazon Web Services, allowing customers to deploy and manage their web application protection entirely in the cloud. On the other hand, Imperva provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, offering customers more flexibility in choosing the deployment model that best fits their specific requirements.
Integration with CDN: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with Amazon CloudFront, a content delivery network service also provided by Amazon Web Services, enabling customers to easily protect their web applications delivered through CloudFront. In contrast, Imperva offers its own CDN solution called Imperva CDN, ensuring tight integration between their web application firewall and content delivery network services for enhanced security and performance.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Imperva is known for its advanced threat intelligence capabilities, providing customers with real-time threat intelligence feeds and security research insights to proactively defend against evolving cyber threats. While AWS WAF also offers some threat intelligence features, Imperva's focus on advanced threat detection and prevention sets it apart as a comprehensive security solution.
Granular Control and Customization: Imperva provides customers with granular control over security policies and configurations, allowing them to customize rules and settings to meet their specific security requirements. This level of customization enables organizations to tailor their web application protection strategies according to their unique threat landscape. In comparison, AWS WAF offers a more standardized set of security rules and configurations, limiting the level of customization available to customers.
Management Interface: AWS WAF is tightly integrated with the AWS Management Console, providing users with a familiar interface for managing their web application firewall configurations alongside other AWS services. In contrast, Imperva offers a more specialized management interface through its web application security platform, providing users with dedicated tools and features for efficiently managing their web application security posture.
Scalability and Performance: AWS WAF is designed to scale seamlessly with the growing demands of web applications, leveraging the reliability and scalability of the AWS cloud infrastructure to deliver high performance under heavy traffic loads. Imperva also offers scalability and performance capabilities, but its focus on comprehensive security features may impact performance to some extent compared to AWS WAF's optimized performance at scale.
In Summary, the key differences between AWS WAF and Imperva lie in their deployment models, integration with CDN, advanced threat intelligence capabilities, level of granular control and customization, management interfaces, and scalability/performance characteristics.
