StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. JavaFX vs jsf

JavaFX vs jsf

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers223
Votes4
JavaFX
JavaFX
Stacks280
Followers418
Votes11

JavaFX vs jsf: What are the differences?

Introduction

JavaFX and JSF (JavaServer Faces) are both frameworks used for developing UIs (User Interfaces) in Java. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: JavaFX is a client-side framework that provides a rich set of built-in UI controls and layouts along with the ability to create custom UI elements. It uses XML-based FXML files to define UI structure and CSS for styling. On the other hand, JSF is a server-side framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture. It uses Facelets, an XML-based view technology, to define UI components and managed beans to handle the application's business logic.

  2. Component Model: JavaFX uses a scene graph-based model where components are organized in a hierarchical structure. This allows for more flexible layout arrangements and complex visual effects. In contrast, JSF uses a component tree model where components are organized in a tree-like structure. JSF provides a rich set of predefined components like input fields, buttons, and tables that can be extended or customized as needed.

  3. Platform Independence: JavaFX is a cross-platform framework that can run on multiple platforms including desktop, web, and mobile. It provides a consistent UI experience across different operating systems. On the other hand, JSF is primarily intended for web applications and runs on Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition) servers. It is not designed to run on platforms other than web.

  4. Data Binding and Validation: JavaFX provides a powerful data binding mechanism that allows for easy synchronization of UI components with the application's data model. It also supports data validation and error handling out of the box. In contrast, JSF provides limited data binding capabilities and relies on validation frameworks like Java Bean Validation (JSR 303) for data validation.

  5. Event Handling and Interactivity: JavaFX provides a comprehensive event handling system that allows for easy handling of various user interactions like mouse clicks, key presses, and touch events. It also supports animations and transitions to enhance interactivity. JSF, on the other hand, relies on server-side event handling and requires page refreshes to update the UI based on user actions.

  6. Integration with Existing Technologies: JavaFX can be easily integrated with other Java technologies like Swing and JavaFX WebView, which allows embedding web content within a JavaFX application. It can also interact with other web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, JSF integrates well with Java EE technologies like EJB (Enterprise JavaBeans) and JPA (Java Persistence API) for enterprise-level development.

In Summary, JavaFX is a client-side cross-platform UI framework with a scene graph-based component model, while JSF is a server-side web UI framework following the MVC architecture. JavaFX provides a more flexible and interactive UI experience, with better platform independence and integration capabilities, while JSF is more focused on web application development with limited platform support and event handling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSF
JSF
JavaFX
JavaFX

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

Statistics
Stacks
138
Stacks
280
Followers
223
Followers
418
Votes
4
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Server Side component
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
Pros
  • 11
    Light
Cons
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
  • 1
    Complicated
Integrations
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to JSF, JavaFX?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase