StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Jelastic vs nginx

Jelastic vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jelastic
Jelastic
Stacks38
Followers60
Votes74
NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K

Jelastic vs nginx: What are the differences?

# Jelastic vs nginx

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Application Support**: Jelastic is a cloud platform that provides support for different programming languages and web application servers, allowing users to deploy various types of applications with ease. On the other hand, nginx is a web server and reverse proxy server that focuses on handling HTTP requests efficiently, providing high performance for serving web content.
2. **Scalability**: Jelastic offers automatic vertical and horizontal scaling capabilities, allowing resources to be added or removed based on application demands. In contrast, nginx can be highly scalable when used in a load-balancing setup to distribute traffic across multiple servers or containers.
3. **Configuration Management**: Jelastic simplifies the management of configurations through a user-friendly GUI, enabling users to easily set up and configure their environments. Conversely, nginx requires manual configuration through text files, which may be challenging for users without a strong technical background.
4. **Built-in Monitoring**: Jelastic provides built-in monitoring tools that allow users to track resource usage, application performance, and other metrics in real-time, facilitating efficient resource management. In comparison, nginx lacks built-in monitoring capabilities, requiring users to rely on third-party tools for monitoring and analysis.
5. **Multi-Cloud Support**: Jelastic offers multi-cloud support, enabling users to choose different cloud providers for hosting their applications and providing flexibility in managing resources across different environments. Whereas nginx is more focused on optimizing web server performance and does not provide native support for multi-cloud deployments.
6. **Containerization**: Jelastic utilizes containerization technology for application deployment, making it easy to package and deploy applications consistently across different environments. In contrast, nginx can be used within containerized environments like Docker, providing flexibility in deploying and managing web servers within containers.

In Summary, Jelastic and nginx differ in application support, scalability, configuration management, built-in monitoring, multi-cloud support, and containerization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jelastic, NGINX

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jelastic
Jelastic
NGINX
NGINX

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Public, Private, Hybrid and Multi-Cloud deployments;Support of microservices and legacy applications with zero code changes;Automated continuous integration, delivery and upgrade processes;More than 50 certified containers out-of-the-box;Managed multi-tenant Kubernetes and Docker containers support;Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling according to applications load;Superb developer web portal for easy provisioning, scaling and updating environments;Open API, CLI and SSH access;Automated replication for application servers and databases;Comprehensive billing engine, quotas and access control policies
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
Stacks
38
Stacks
115.0K
Followers
60
Followers
61.9K
Votes
74
Votes
5.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Automatic scaling
  • 12
    Managed hosting
  • 12
    Pay-per-Use on an hourly basis
  • 8
    Constantly evolving
  • 6
    Multiple hosting providers
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Jenkins
Jenkins
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
WordPress
WordPress
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
Cassandra
Cassandra
GitLab
GitLab
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jelastic, NGINX?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase