Jenkins vs Notepad++

Overview

Notepad++

Stacks20.4K

Followers16.8K

Votes422

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Jenkins vs Notepad++: What are the differences?

Jenkins is a powerful automation server used for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD), while Notepad++ is a text editor tailored for code editing and manipulation. Let's explore the key differences between Jenkins and Notepad++:

Purpose and Functionality: Jenkins is an automation server that plays a pivotal role in implementing CI/CD pipelines. It automates various stages of software development, including building, testing, and deployment. Jenkins enables teams to integrate code changes frequently, detect errors early, and deliver software updates more reliably. On the other hand, Notepad++ is a lightweight text editor primarily used for code editing. It provides syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and other features to enhance code readability and development.
Automation vs Text Editing: Jenkins excels in automating repetitive tasks in the software development lifecycle. It monitors version control systems for code changes, triggers automated builds and tests, and deploys applications to various environments. Notepad++, however, focuses on providing developers with a feature-rich text editor that facilitates code creation, modification, and review.
Integration and Extensibility: Jenkins is highly extensible through its vast collection of plugins, which allow integration with various tools, technologies, and services. Teams can customize their CI/CD pipelines by adding plugins that suit their specific requirements. Notepad++ also supports plugins, enabling users to enhance its functionality with features like code linting, version control integration, and more.
Collaboration and CI/CD: Jenkins fosters collaboration among development, testing, and operations teams by automating the integration and deployment processes. It helps ensure that code changes are thoroughly tested and verified before being released. Notepad++, while not inherently focused on collaboration, can be used by individual developers for code creation and modification, contributing to the overall development process.
Scalability and Environments: Jenkins can handle complex CI/CD workflows and is suitable for projects of various sizes. It can integrate with multiple build and test environments and supports parallel execution of tasks. Notepad++, however, is primarily designed for individual developers and may not be as suitable for large-scale projects requiring collaborative code editing.
User Interface: Jenkins provides a web-based user interface that allows users to configure and manage their CI/CD pipelines visually. It offers various plugins and integrations to facilitate easy navigation and management. Notepad++ offers a desktop application with a customizable interface optimized for code editing, with features like tabbed editing, multi-language support, and a user-friendly toolbar.
Workflow vs Code Editing: Jenkins' main focus is on automating and orchestrating the software development process through CI/CD pipelines. It enables teams to define workflows, integrate tools, and automate repetitive tasks. Notepad++ excels at providing a platform for developers to write and edit code efficiently, offering a range of features designed to enhance code quality and productivity.

In summary, Jenkins is a CI/CD automation server that streamlines software development processes, while Notepad++ is a code-centric text editor designed to enhance code editing and development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Notepad++, Jenkins

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Notepad++	Jenkins
Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.	In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Syntax Highlighting and Syntax Folding;User Defined Syntax Highlighting and Folding: screenshot 1, screenshot 2, screenshot 3 and screenshot 4;PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expression) Search/Replace;GUI entirely customizable: minimalist, tab with close button, multi-line tab, vertical tab and vertical document list;Document Map;Auto-completion: Word completion, Function completion and Function parameters hint;Multi-Document (Tab interface);Multi-View;WYSIWYG (Printing);Zoom in and zoom out;Multi-Language environment supported;Bookmark;Macro recording and playback;Launch with different arguments	Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 20.4K	Stacks 59.2K
Followers 16.8K	Followers 50.4K
Votes 422	Votes 2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 104 Syntax for all languages that i use 60 Tabbed ui 56 Great code editor 54 Fast and lightweight 38 Plugins Cons 3 No default plugin manager 2 Can't install more advanced packets	Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support

What are some alternatives to Notepad++, Jenkins?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

Purpose and Functionality: Jenkins is an automation server that plays a pivotal role in implementing CI/CD pipelines. It automates various stages of software development, including building, testing, and deployment. Jenkins enables teams to integrate code changes frequently, detect errors early, and deliver software updates more reliably. On the other hand, Notepad++ is a lightweight text editor primarily used for code editing. It provides syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and other features to enhance code readability and development.
Automation vs Text Editing: Jenkins excels in automating repetitive tasks in the software development lifecycle. It monitors version control systems for code changes, triggers automated builds and tests, and deploys applications to various environments. Notepad++, however, focuses on providing developers with a feature-rich text editor that facilitates code creation, modification, and review.
Integration and Extensibility: Jenkins is highly extensible through its vast collection of plugins, which allow integration with various tools, technologies, and services. Teams can customize their CI/CD pipelines by adding plugins that suit their specific requirements. Notepad++ also supports plugins, enabling users to enhance its functionality with features like code linting, version control integration, and more.
Collaboration and CI/CD: Jenkins fosters collaboration among development, testing, and operations teams by automating the integration and deployment processes. It helps ensure that code changes are thoroughly tested and verified before being released. Notepad++, while not inherently focused on collaboration, can be used by individual developers for code creation and modification, contributing to the overall development process.
Scalability and Environments: Jenkins can handle complex CI/CD workflows and is suitable for projects of various sizes. It can integrate with multiple build and test environments and supports parallel execution of tasks. Notepad++, however, is primarily designed for individual developers and may not be as suitable for large-scale projects requiring collaborative code editing.
User Interface: Jenkins provides a web-based user interface that allows users to configure and manage their CI/CD pipelines visually. It offers various plugins and integrations to facilitate easy navigation and management. Notepad++ offers a desktop application with a customizable interface optimized for code editing, with features like tabbed editing, multi-language support, and a user-friendly toolbar.
Workflow vs Code Editing: Jenkins' main focus is on automating and orchestrating the software development process through CI/CD pipelines. It enables teams to define workflows, integrate tools, and automate repetitive tasks. Notepad++ excels at providing a platform for developers to write and edit code efficiently, offering a range of features designed to enhance code quality and productivity.

In summary, Jenkins is a CI/CD automation server that streamlines software development processes, while Notepad++ is a code-centric text editor designed to enhance code editing and development.

Jenkins vs Notepad++