StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Rundeck

Jenkins vs Rundeck

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Rundeck
Rundeck
Stacks204
Followers343
Votes7

Jenkins vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jenkins and Rundeck are both popular automation tools used in the field of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD). While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration Capabilities: Jenkins is primarily designed for building, testing, and deploying applications, with strong integration capabilities with various development tools and platforms. Rundeck, on the other hand, focuses on workflow orchestration and job scheduling. It excels in managing and executing complex tasks across different systems and environments.

  2. User Interface: Jenkins provides a feature-rich web interface with a wide range of plugins, allowing for customization and extensibility but often result in a more complex user experience. Rundeck, in contrast, offers a simpler and more intuitive user interface that emphasizes ease of use and navigation, making it suitable for both technical and non-technical users.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Jenkins is known for its scalability and ability to handle large deployments. It can distribute workloads across multiple agents, enabling parallel execution of tasks. Rundeck, however, is designed for small to medium-sized environments, with a focus on reliability and performance for specific workflows and jobs.

  4. Security and Access Control: Jenkins has a comprehensive security framework, allowing for fine-grained access control and authorization through plugins. It also supports integration with external user authentication systems. Rundeck offers similar security features but with a stronger emphasis on securing job execution in multi-user environments, providing options for credential management and enforcing role-based access control.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins has a large and active community with a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations available. It has been widely adopted and supported by various industry players. Rundeck, although it has a smaller community, has its own ecosystem of plugins and integrations, providing specific functionalities for workflow automation and job scheduling.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Jenkins is an open-source project with the core software available under the MIT License. However, some enterprise features and integrations may require commercial plugins or subscriptions. Rundeck offers both an open-source edition and a commercial enterprise edition, with additional features and support available for the latter.

In summary, Jenkins and Rundeck differ in terms of their focus, user interface, scalability, security, community, and licensing. Understanding these differences is crucial in determining which tool is the best fit for specific CI/CD needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Rundeck

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Rundeck
Rundeck

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
204
Followers
50.4K
Followers
343
Votes
2.2K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
Integrations
No integrations available
Ansible
Ansible

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Rundeck?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana