Jenkins vs Yarn

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Yarn

Stacks28.2K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

Jenkins vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Jenkins and Yarn are both widely used technologies in the software development industry. While they serve different purposes, they are crucial in managing and automating various aspects of the software development process. In order to better understand their differences, let's explore some key distinctions between Jenkins and Yarn.

Architecture: Jenkins is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform that allows developers to integrate their code changes regularly and automate the deployment process. It follows a master-slave architecture, where the master node manages the job distribution to multiple slave nodes. On the other hand, Yarn is a package manager that helps in managing dependencies for JavaScript projects. It is specifically designed for large-scale applications and follows a distributed architecture, which allows for efficient resource management.
Main Purpose: Jenkins is primarily used for automating the build, test, and deployment processes in software development. It provides extensive support for various plugins and integrations with different tools, making it highly flexible and customizable. On the contrary, Yarn focuses solely on handling package dependencies for JavaScript projects. It optimizes the installation and management of packages, enabling faster and more efficient development.
Support for Multiple Languages: Jenkins supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for projects developed in different technologies. It offers robust support for languages like Java, Python, Ruby, and more. Yarn, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript projects and is most commonly used in conjunction with Node.js.
Community and Extensibility: Jenkins has a large and active community that constantly contributes new plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality. This makes it highly extensible and adaptable to diverse development environments. Yarn also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem is more focused on package management rather than plugins and extensions.
Deployment Flexibility: Jenkins excels in automating and orchestrating the deployment process by integrating with various tools and technologies. It can be used to deploy applications to different environments, such as on-premises servers, cloud platforms, or containerized environments like Docker. Yarn, on the other hand, does not directly handle deployment but focuses on managing dependencies during the development phase.

In summary, Jenkins serves as a versatile CI/CD platform that automates the software development pipeline and offers extensive customizability, while Yarn specializes in managing package dependencies for JavaScript projects, enabling faster and more efficient development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Yarn

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Yarn
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars 41.5K
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 28.2K
Followers 50.4K	Followers 13.5K
Votes 2.2K	Votes 151
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines	Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Yarn?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

Jenkins vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Architecture: Jenkins is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform that allows developers to integrate their code changes regularly and automate the deployment process. It follows a master-slave architecture, where the master node manages the job distribution to multiple slave nodes. On the other hand, Yarn is a package manager that helps in managing dependencies for JavaScript projects. It is specifically designed for large-scale applications and follows a distributed architecture, which allows for efficient resource management.
Main Purpose: Jenkins is primarily used for automating the build, test, and deployment processes in software development. It provides extensive support for various plugins and integrations with different tools, making it highly flexible and customizable. On the contrary, Yarn focuses solely on handling package dependencies for JavaScript projects. It optimizes the installation and management of packages, enabling faster and more efficient development.
Support for Multiple Languages: Jenkins supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for projects developed in different technologies. It offers robust support for languages like Java, Python, Ruby, and more. Yarn, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript projects and is most commonly used in conjunction with Node.js.
Community and Extensibility: Jenkins has a large and active community that constantly contributes new plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality. This makes it highly extensible and adaptable to diverse development environments. Yarn also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem is more focused on package management rather than plugins and extensions.
Deployment Flexibility: Jenkins excels in automating and orchestrating the deployment process by integrating with various tools and technologies. It can be used to deploy applications to different environments, such as on-premises servers, cloud platforms, or containerized environments like Docker. Yarn, on the other hand, does not directly handle deployment but focuses on managing dependencies during the development phase.

Jenkins vs Yarn

Overview