StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Jetpack vs Webpack

Jetpack vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
Jetpack
Jetpack
Stacks79
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks29

Jetpack vs Webpack: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jetpack and Webpack

Jetpack and Webpack are both popular development tools used in web development. While they have similar names, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Here are the key differences between Jetpack and Webpack:

  1. Functionality: Jetpack is a plugin collection developed by WordPress that adds various features and functionalities to a WordPress website. It provides a wide range of tools and services such as security, performance optimization, and customization options. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler that helps manage and bundle JavaScript modules along with their dependencies for usage in a web browser. It allows developers to structure their codebase efficiently and optimize loading times.

  2. Usage: Jetpack is specifically designed for WordPress websites and is seamlessly integrated into the WordPress ecosystem. It can be installed and activated on a WordPress site to enhance its functionality. Webpack, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose tool and can be used with any web development project, irrespective of the CMS or framework being used. It is particularly useful for projects that involve complex dependency management and asset bundling.

  3. Configuration: Jetpack usually requires minimal configuration as its features are pre-built and designed to work out-of-the-box with WordPress sites. Once activated, it can be managed through the WordPress dashboard. On the contrary, Webpack requires more extensive configuration. Developers need to define entry points, specify loaders, and configure plugins to determine how their project's assets are processed, transformed, and bundled. This level of customization allows for more fine-grained control over the project's build process.

  4. Module System: Jetpack does not directly handle JavaScript module management. Instead, it focuses on adding features and functionality to WordPress sites through its collection of plugins. Webpack, on the other hand, excels in managing JavaScript modules and their dependencies. It supports various module formats such as CommonJS, AMD, and ES modules, allowing developers to structure their code modularly and import/export dependencies between modules easily.

  5. Development vs Production: Jetpack is primarily focused on enhancing the features and functionality of a WordPress site during its development and production stages. It provides tools for site statistics, security, backup, and other features for both site owners and site visitors. On the other hand, Webpack is more geared towards the development phase. It optimizes the development workflow by allowing hot module replacement, code splitting, and other development-oriented features. It also provides optimized production builds by minimizing and compressing the code, improving overall site performance.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Jetpack has a large and active community due to its close association with WordPress. There is a vast number of plugins available, along with extensive documentation and support from the WordPress community. Webpack also has a thriving community and a vast ecosystem of loaders, plugins, and starter kits that can be used to enhance its functionality and tailor it to specific project requirements.

In summary, Jetpack is a WordPress plugin collection that enhances the features and functionality of WordPress websites, while Webpack is a module bundler that efficiently manages JavaScript modules and their dependencies for any web development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, Jetpack

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
Jetpack
Jetpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Jetpack wraps webpack to create a smoother developer experience. Jetpack can be used instead of webpack, webpack-cli, webpack-dev-server and webpack-dev-middleware without writing any configuration. Jetpack is a thin wrapper around webpack, and can be extended with any of the webpack configuration.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
29
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
79
Followers
28.1K
Followers
43
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
Babel
Babel
PostCSS
PostCSS

What are some alternatives to Webpack, Jetpack?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana