Apache Maven vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

JFrog Artifactory

Stacks342

Followers374

Votes0

Apache Maven vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code highlights the key differences between Apache Maven and JFrog Artifactory, two widely used tools in the software development industry.

Build Automation and Dependency Management: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation and dependency management tool. It uses a declarative XML-based format to define project configurations, dependencies, and build steps. On the other hand, JFrog Artifactory is a repository manager that provides a centralized location for storing and managing binary artifacts, including libraries, dependencies, and other build outputs.
Centralized Artifact and Repository Management: While Maven focuses on the build process and project structure, Artifactory is designed to manage the lifecycle of artifacts throughout their development and deployment. Artifactory offers comprehensive support for version control, caching, security, and access control, making it a valuable component for large-scale software development teams.
Integration and Ecosystem: Maven is well-integrated with various build tools, such as Jenkins, and has a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions to support various development tasks. It follows the "convention over configuration" principle and provides standardized project structures. Artifactory, on the other hand, integrates with different build systems, including Maven, Gradle, and Ivy, making it a versatile solution for organizations using multiple technologies.
Artifactory as a Universal Repository: JFrog Artifactory is designed to be a universal repository manager, supporting not only Java-based projects but also various other technologies, including .NET, Python, Ruby, and more. This versatility allows organizations with diverse development stacks to centralize their artifact storage and management within a single tool. Maven, on the other hand, is primarily focused on Java development.
Continuous Integration and Deployment: Artifactory provides robust support for continuous integration and deployment processes. It seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and Bamboo, and offers features like artifact promotion, checksum-based storage, and distribution management. While Maven can be used in CI/CD pipelines, its main focus is on the build process and dependency management rather than full CI/CD capabilities.
Licensing and Pricing: Apache Maven is an open-source project and is provided under the Apache License. It is free to use and offers great flexibility and extensibility. JFrog Artifactory, on the other hand, offers a range of licensing options, including both commercial licenses and an open-source community edition. The licensing model of Artifactory provides additional support, advanced features, and enterprise-grade scalability based on the specific requirements and budget of an organization.

In Summary, Apache Maven focuses primarily on build automation and dependency management with a strong Java-centric approach, while JFrog Artifactory serves as a comprehensive universal repository manager that supports various technologies, offers extensive lifecycle management features, and integrates well with CI/CD processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache Maven, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

GitHub

JFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven	JFrog Artifactory
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.	It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3.4K	Stacks 342
Followers 1.7K	Followers 374
Votes 414	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Debian npm

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

Apache Maven vs JFrog Artifactory: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code highlights the key differences between Apache Maven and JFrog Artifactory, two widely used tools in the software development industry.

Build Automation and Dependency Management: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation and dependency management tool. It uses a declarative XML-based format to define project configurations, dependencies, and build steps. On the other hand, JFrog Artifactory is a repository manager that provides a centralized location for storing and managing binary artifacts, including libraries, dependencies, and other build outputs.
Centralized Artifact and Repository Management: While Maven focuses on the build process and project structure, Artifactory is designed to manage the lifecycle of artifacts throughout their development and deployment. Artifactory offers comprehensive support for version control, caching, security, and access control, making it a valuable component for large-scale software development teams.
Integration and Ecosystem: Maven is well-integrated with various build tools, such as Jenkins, and has a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions to support various development tasks. It follows the "convention over configuration" principle and provides standardized project structures. Artifactory, on the other hand, integrates with different build systems, including Maven, Gradle, and Ivy, making it a versatile solution for organizations using multiple technologies.
Artifactory as a Universal Repository: JFrog Artifactory is designed to be a universal repository manager, supporting not only Java-based projects but also various other technologies, including .NET, Python, Ruby, and more. This versatility allows organizations with diverse development stacks to centralize their artifact storage and management within a single tool. Maven, on the other hand, is primarily focused on Java development.
Continuous Integration and Deployment: Artifactory provides robust support for continuous integration and deployment processes. It seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and Bamboo, and offers features like artifact promotion, checksum-based storage, and distribution management. While Maven can be used in CI/CD pipelines, its main focus is on the build process and dependency management rather than full CI/CD capabilities.
Licensing and Pricing: Apache Maven is an open-source project and is provided under the Apache License. It is free to use and offers great flexibility and extensibility. JFrog Artifactory, on the other hand, offers a range of licensing options, including both commercial licenses and an open-source community edition. The licensing model of Artifactory provides additional support, advanced features, and enterprise-grade scalability based on the specific requirements and budget of an organization.

Apache Maven vs JFrog Artifactory

Overview