Jitsi vs Mediasoup: What are the differences?

## Introduction

## 1. Scalability:
Jitsi uses a centralized architecture, which limits the scalability based on server capacity and bandwidth availability. On the other hand, Mediasoup uses a decentralized architecture, allowing for better scalability by distributing media processing across multiple nodes.

## 2. Media Processing:
Jitsi processes media on the server side, which can lead to higher server requirements and potential bottlenecks during high usage. Mediasoup, on the other hand, processes media directly on the client side, reducing the load on the server and improving overall performance.

## 3. Customization:
Jitsi offers limited customization options, primarily through plugins and API integrations. In contrast, Mediasoup provides a more extensive customization capability, allowing developers to have greater control over the media handling and integration with other systems.

## 4. Security:
Jitsi has security features but may not be as robust as Mediasoup, which prioritizes security and provides more advanced encryption options and compliance with industry standards to ensure secure communication.

## 5. Integration:
Jitsi is suitable for quick and easy implementations but may lack the flexibility needed for complex integration scenarios. Mediasoup, on the other hand, offers a more robust set of integration options, making it better suited for projects requiring deeper integration with existing systems.

## 6. Community Support:
Jitsi has a larger community of users and contributors, making it easier to find resources and get help. Mediasoup, while not as widely adopted, has a growing community and strong developer support for more specialized use cases.

In Summary, Jitsi and Mediasoup differ in scalability, media processing, customization, security, integration, and community support.