StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Joomla! vs Typo3

Joomla! vs Typo3

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Joomla!
Joomla!
Stacks1.5K
Followers337
Votes37
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks3.7K
Typo3
Typo3
Stacks130
Followers86
Votes50

Joomla! vs Typo3: What are the differences?

Introduction

Joomla! and TYPO3 are popular content management systems (CMS) used for building and managing websites. While they both serve the purpose of managing content, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Installation and Setup: Joomla! offers a straightforward and user-friendly installation process, making it easier for beginners to get started. On the other hand, TYPO3 requires more technical expertise and knowledge of server configuration, making it better suited for more experienced users or developers.

  2. Customization and Flexibility: Joomla! provides a wide range of ready-to-use extensions and templates, allowing users to customize and modify their websites with ease. TYPO3, on the other hand, offers a higher level of customization and flexibility, making it an ideal choice for complex and highly customizable websites.

  3. User Interface and Ease of Use: Joomla! has a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for non-technical users to manage and update their websites. TYPO3, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and a more complex interface, which may require some training and expertise to fully utilize its capabilities.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Joomla! is known for its scalability and can handle small to medium-sized websites efficiently. However, TYPO3 is built for handling large and complex websites with thousands of pages, making it better suited for enterprise-level projects that require high performance and scalability.

  5. Community and Support: Joomla! has a large and active community, providing extensive support through forums, documentation, and regular updates. TYPO3 also has a dedicated community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Joomla!, making it more challenging to find resources and support for specific issues.

  6. Security: Joomla! has a good track record when it comes to security, with regular updates and a proactive security team. TYPO3 also has strong security measures in place and a dedicated security team, making it a secure choice for websites that handle sensitive data.

In summary, Joomla! is a user-friendly and versatile CMS suitable for small to medium-sized websites, while TYPO3 offers advanced customization and scalability for larger, complex websites with more technical requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Joomla!, Typo3

Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Joomla!
Joomla!
Typo3
Typo3

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

User Management;Media Manager;Language Manager;Banner Management;Contact Management; Polls;Search;Web Link Management;Content Management;Syndication and Newsfeed Management;Menu Manager;Template Management;Integrated Help System;System Features;Web Services;Powerful Extensibility
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
130
Followers
337
Followers
86
Votes
37
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Vast repository of free and paid extensions
Cons
  • 1
    Depleting dev community
Pros
  • 7
    Great Security
  • 6
    Enterprise CMS
  • 5
    LTS and ELTS
  • 5
    Open source
  • 4
    Multi language

What are some alternatives to Joomla!, Typo3?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Craft

Craft

Craft is a content management system (CMS) that’s laser-focused on doing one thing really, really well: managing content.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack