StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Joomla! vs Webiny Headless CMS

Joomla! vs Webiny Headless CMS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Joomla!
Joomla!
Stacks1.5K
Followers337
Votes37
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks3.7K
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS
Stacks11
Followers39
Votes19
GitHub Stars7.9K
Forks660

Joomla! vs Webiny Headless CMS: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Capabilities: Joomla! is a traditional CMS that excels in content management and website creation, while Webiny Headless CMS is designed primarily for headless architecture, offering greater flexibility and broader integration capabilities with various external systems and tools through APIs.

  2. Content Relationship Handling: Joomla! includes hierarchical content management features that make it easier to create complex content structures with parent-child relationships, whereas Webiny Headless CMS focuses on content relationships in a more flexible and customizable way, allowing for easier management of content across multiple platforms and devices.

  3. User Interface Customization: While Joomla! provides a user-friendly interface for managing content and website design, Webiny Headless CMS places more emphasis on allowing developers to customize the interface and user experience to suit their specific needs, making it ideal for businesses with unique design requirements.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Joomla! is known for catering well to medium-sized websites with its built-in functionalities, whereas Webiny Headless CMS is designed to handle high traffic and large-scale content management tasks more efficiently, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level websites and applications.

  5. Technical Learning Curve: Joomla! offers a simpler learning curve for users due to its all-in-one approach to website building, whereas Webiny Headless CMS requires a certain level of technical expertise to set up and configure the headless architecture and integrations, making it more suitable for experienced developers and tech-savvy individuals.

  6. License and Cost: Joomla! is an open-source CMS available for free, with additional premium extensions and support services offered at a cost, while Webiny Headless CMS is also open-source but comes with enterprise versions that offer more advanced features and support services at a price.

In Summary, Joomla! is a versatile CMS for traditional website building, while Webiny Headless CMS is tailored for headless architecture, emphasizing flexibility, integration capabilities, and customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Joomla!, Webiny Headless CMS

Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Joomla!
Joomla!
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

A big chunk of your server resources aren't utilized. With Webiny adopt serverless and save 60-80% on your cloud hosting bill and on infrastructure operations costs. Forget worrying about flash crowds and uptime.

User Management;Media Manager;Language Manager;Banner Management;Contact Management; Polls;Search;Web Link Management;Content Management;Syndication and Newsfeed Management;Menu Manager;Template Management;Integrated Help System;System Features;Web Services;Powerful Extensibility
Powerful content modelling UI; GraphQL API; Multi-language support; 100% Javascript; Microservices architecture; Support for multiple environments and aliases
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
7.9K
GitHub Forks
3.7K
GitHub Forks
660
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
11
Followers
337
Followers
39
Votes
37
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Extensions & Templates
Cons
  • 1
    Depleting dev community
Pros
  • 4
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Serverless
  • 3
    Rapid Development
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Api based cms
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
GraphQL
GraphQL
Swift
Swift
Next.js
Next.js
Gatsby
Gatsby

What are some alternatives to Joomla!, Webiny Headless CMS?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack