StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JSF vs Spring Boot

JSF vs Spring Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K
JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers223
Votes4

JSF vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?

Key Differences between JSF and Spring Boot

JavaServer Faces (JSF) and Spring Boot are both popular frameworks used for Java web development. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two. The following paragraphs highlight six main differences between JSF and Spring Boot.

  1. Architecture: JSF is a component-based framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture. It provides a rich set of UI components and simplifies the development of complex user interfaces. In contrast, Spring Boot is a microservices-oriented framework that follows the principle of convention over configuration. It is designed to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring-based applications with minimal configuration.

  2. Dependency Injection: Spring Boot provides built-in support for dependency injection, which allows for the easy management and injection of external dependencies. This feature enables loose coupling and promotes modular and reusable code. On the other hand, JSF does not have built-in support for dependency injection. However, it can be integrated with other dependency injection frameworks, such as CDI (Contexts and Dependency Injection).

3 Scalability and Flexibility: Spring Boot is known for its scalability and flexibility. It offers a range of features, such as auto-configuration and embedded servers, that make it easy to build, deploy, and scale applications. Additionally, Spring Boot can be easily integrated with other Spring projects, such as Spring Security and Spring Data. In comparison, JSF is more limited in terms of scalability and flexibility. It is often used for small to medium-sized applications and may require additional frameworks for certain functionalities.

  1. Testing: Spring Boot provides excellent support for testing by offering various testing utilities and frameworks, such as JUnit and Mockito. It enables developers to write unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests for their applications. In contrast, testing can be more challenging in JSF due to its tightly-coupled nature and limited testing utilities.

  2. Community Support: Spring Boot has a large and active community of developers, which means there is a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support available. This makes it easier for developers to find help, troubleshoot issues, and stay updated with the latest developments. Although JSF also has a community, it is relatively smaller and may not have the same level of support and resources as Spring Boot.

  3. Integration with other frameworks: Spring Boot integrates seamlessly with various other frameworks, such as Spring MVC, Spring Security, and Spring Data, which enables developers to leverage the benefits of these frameworks in their applications. In contrast, JSF can be integrated with other Java EE frameworks, such as CDI and JPA, but may require additional effort and configuration.

In summary, JSF and Spring Boot are two distinct frameworks with different focuses and functionalities. JSF is a component-based framework suitable for building UI-intensive applications, while Spring Boot is a flexible and scalable framework designed for building enterprise-grade applications with ease.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, JSF

Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments
Milan
Milan

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNode.jsNode.jsReactReact

Hi, I am looking to select tech stack for front end and back end development. Considering Spring Boot vs Node.js for developing microservices. Front end tech stack is selected as React framework. Both of them are equally good for me, long term perspective most of services will be more based on I/O vs heavy computing. Leaning toward node.js, but will require team to learn this tech stack, so little hesitant.

650k views650k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
JSF
JSF

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Statistics
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
41.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
26.7K
Stacks
138
Followers
24.3K
Followers
223
Votes
1.0K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Server Side component
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
Integrations
Spring
Spring
Java
Java
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, JSF?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase