StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. JSHint vs JSLint

JSHint vs JSLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSHint
JSHint
Stacks1.4K
Followers59
Votes0
JSLint
JSLint
Stacks88
Followers29
Votes0

JSHint vs JSLint: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between JSHint and JSLint, two popular tools for static code analysis in JavaScript.

1. **Architecture**: JSHint is built on top of Esprima parser, whereas JSLint has its own parser. This difference in architecture can affect the parsing and validation process of JavaScript code.
2. **Customization**: JSHint allows more customization through its extensive list of configurable options, giving developers more control over which rules to enforce. In contrast, JSLint has a stricter set of rules that cannot be easily modified.
3. **Output Format**: JSHint provides more user-friendly and detailed error messages compared to JSLint. This can assist developers in quickly identifying and fixing issues in their code.
4. **Development Community**: JSHint has a larger and more active development community, resulting in more frequent updates and support for modern JavaScript features. On the other hand, JSLint has a smaller community and may not receive updates as regularly.
5. **License**: JSHint is licensed under the MIT License, allowing for more flexibility in usage and modification, while JSLint is licensed under the less permissive JSLint License, which has stricter usage restrictions.
6. **Configurability**: JSHint offers more flexibility in terms of configuration and allows developers to enable or disable specific rules as needed. JSLint, on the other hand, has a stricter approach with fewer configuration options available.

In Summary, this Markdown code highlights key differences between JSHint and JSLint, including their architecture, customization options, output formats, development communities, licenses, and configurability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSHint
JSHint
JSLint
JSLint

It is a community-driven tool to detect errors and potential problems in JavaScript code. It is open source and can easily adjust in the environment you expect your code to execute.

It is a static code analysis tool used in software development for checking if JavaScript source code complies with coding rules. It is provided primarily as a browser-based web application accessible through their domain, but there are also command-line adaptations.

community-driven tool; javascript code checker
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
88
Followers
59
Followers
29
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    Non-intuitive configuration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Zendesk
Zendesk
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to JSHint, JSLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana