StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. JSLint vs SonarLint

JSLint vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSLint
JSLint
Stacks88
Followers29
Votes0
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

JSLint vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

In this article, we will explore the key differences between JSLint and SonarLint. JSLint and SonarLint are tools used for static code analysis to identify and report issues in JavaScript code. Although they serve a similar purpose, there are significant differences between them.
  1. Integration with IDEs: JSLint is primarily integrated with IDEs like Sublime Text and Atom, while SonarLint is designed to integrate with various IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio. SonarLint provides real-time feedback within the IDE as developers write code, making it more convenient for developers to fix issues immediately.

  2. Supported Rules: JSLint has a predefined set of rules enforced on the code, and developers do not have much flexibility to modify or customize these rules. On the other hand, SonarLint provides a wide range of customizable rules that can be tailored based on project requirements, allowing developers to have more control over the analysis process and the rules enforced.

  3. Scope of Analysis: JSLint focuses solely on JavaScript code and performs limited analysis for potential issues. It primarily checks for common mistakes, coding conventions, and formatting. SonarLint, on the other hand, not only supports JavaScript but also offers support for multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, and more. It provides comprehensive analysis, including code smells, security vulnerabilities, and maintainability issues, making it a more versatile tool for multi-language projects.

  4. Learning Curve: JSLint has a simplistic and straightforward approach, with fewer options and configurations to worry about. It is relatively easier to set up and use, making it suitable for developers who prefer simplicity. SonarLint, however, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features, customizable rules, and deeper analysis capabilities. It may require time and effort to understand and configure all the options based on the project's needs.

  5. License and Cost: JSLint is an open-source tool and free to use for both personal and commercial projects. SonarLint, on the other hand, is a part of the SonarSource suite, which offers both free and commercial versions. The availability of additional features and support may vary based on the edition chosen, and some advanced features may require a paid license.

  6. Community Support: JSLint has been around for a long time and has a robust community supporting it. Developers can find extensive documentation, libraries, and forums to seek help and guidance. SonarLint also has an active community, but it may not be as extensive as JSLint due to its relatively newer entry in the market.

In summary, JSLint and SonarLint differ in terms of IDE integration, supported rules, scope of analysis, learning curve, license and cost, and community support. While JSLint is simpler and focuses solely on JavaScript, SonarLint provides more extensive analysis, supports multiple programming languages, and offers customizable rules and real-time feedback within IDEs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSLint
JSLint
SonarLint
SonarLint

It is a static code analysis tool used in software development for checking if JavaScript source code complies with coding rules. It is provided primarily as a browser-based web application accessible through their domain, but there are also command-line adaptations.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

-
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
Stacks
88
Stacks
175
Followers
29
Followers
352
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
No integrations available
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to JSLint, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana