StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. JUCE vs NodeGUI

JUCE vs NodeGUI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JUCE
JUCE
Stacks39
Followers74
Votes10
NodeGUI
NodeGUI
Stacks15
Followers109
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks308

JUCE vs NodeGUI: What are the differences?

JUCE vs NodeGUI

JUCE and NodeGUI are both frameworks used for developing cross-platform desktop applications. However, there are key differences between them that set them apart.

  1. Integration with platforms: JUCE is primarily focused on developing audio and music applications and offers seamless integration with various platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android. On the other hand, NodeGUI is built on top of the Node.js runtime and offers a native experience only for macOS and Windows platforms.

  2. Programming Language: JUCE is based on C++ and provides a comprehensive set of libraries and tools for software development. It offers low-level control and performance optimization. Conversely, NodeGUI uses JavaScript and allows developers to leverage the vast ecosystem of npm modules, making it easier to find existing libraries and tools.

  3. Graphical User Interface: JUCE provides a range of pre-built GUI components, allowing developers to create visually appealing interfaces. It offers extensive customization options and supports both traditional desktop applications and plugins. In contrast, NodeGUI uses the React framework to build interfaces. This promotes component-based development, enhanced reusability, and rapid prototyping.

  4. Community and Support: JUCE has a strong and established community with active forums and extensive documentation. It is widely adopted in the audio and music industry, contributing to a wealth of resources and knowledge. NodeGUI, being relatively new, has a smaller community, but benefits from the popularity of JavaScript and React, which results in a growing ecosystem of resources.

  5. Development Workflow: JUCE applications are typically developed using an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) such as Xcode, Visual Studio, or Projucer. It offers a comprehensive debugging environment and supports various workflows. In contrast, NodeGUI leverages the Node.js ecosystem and can be developed using popular code editors like Visual Studio Code. It also benefits from the rapid development cycle associated with JavaScript.

  6. Deployment and Distribution: JUCE provides extensive support for packaging and deploying applications on different platforms. It offers easy integration with app stores and provides tools for code signing and distribution. On the other hand, NodeGUI applications can be distributed using prebuilt binaries or bundled within an Electron-like runtime, making it easier to distribute on multiple platforms.

In summary, JUCE and NodeGUI differ in terms of platform integration, programming language, GUI framework, community support, development workflow, and deployment options. These differences make them suited for different use cases and preferences in developing cross-platform desktop applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JUCE
JUCE
NodeGUI
NodeGUI

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.
Cross platform;Low CPU and memory footprint;Styling with CSS ;Complete Nodejs api support ;Good Devtools support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
308
Stacks
39
Stacks
15
Followers
74
Followers
109
Votes
10
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Fast
  • 1
    Nice GUI
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Free Edition has Made with Juce
Pros
  • 1
    Rich API which binds C++ QT
  • 1
    No webkit thus super resource efficient
  • 1
    It uses Qode which is a fork of Node to be used with QT
  • 1
    Has React & Vue support named (react|vue)-nodegui
  • 1
    Its not hybrid & fully native.
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have x86 support
Integrations
Android OS
Android OS
React Native
React Native
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
iOS
iOS
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
Windows
Windows
CSS 3
CSS 3
macOS
macOS
Qt
Qt

What are some alternatives to JUCE, NodeGUI?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase