LoadNinja vs k6

Overview

Stacks257

Followers226

Votes56

LoadNinja

Stacks12

Followers40

Votes0

LoadNinja vs k6: What are the differences?

Introduction LoadNinja and k6 are both performance testing tools that help to identify and fix performance issues in web applications. However, there are key differences between the two tools that make them suitable for different use cases.

Architecture: LoadNinja is a cloud-based performance testing solution that allows users to run tests from different geographic locations using real browsers, while k6 is an open-source performance testing tool that runs tests locally using virtual users.
Scripting Language: LoadNinja uses a visual scripting language, making it easy for non-technical users to create and modify test scripts without writing any code. On the other hand, k6 uses JavaScript as its scripting language, providing more flexibility and customization options for advanced users.
Scalability: LoadNinja can scale tests to simulate thousands of virtual users without requiring additional hardware or infrastructure setup. k6, on the other hand, relies on the user's local machine for test execution, which may limit the scalability of the tests.
Real User Monitoring: LoadNinja offers real user monitoring capabilities, allowing users to gain insights into the performance of their web application from the perspective of real users. k6 does not provide out-of-the-box real user monitoring features.
Integration with CI/CD: LoadNinja integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, enabling users to incorporate performance testing into their existing continuous integration and deployment processes. k6 also provides integration with CI/CD pipelines but may require more manual configuration and setup.
Pricing Model: LoadNinja follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or yearly fee based on the number of virtual users and test duration. On the other hand, k6 is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective option for small teams or individuals.

**In Summary, LoadNinja offers cloud-based testing with a visual scripting language and real user monitoring, while k6 provides local testing with JavaScript scripting and integration with CI/CD pipelines. LoadNinja is more scalable and suitable for large-scale testing, while k6 is a cost-effective option for small teams or individuals.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on k6, LoadNinja

Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

k6	LoadNinja
It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.	It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.
Written in Go and JavaScript, built to integrate well into the modern developer workflow and automation pipelines; Primarily for load testing, it also works for functional testing of APIs and microservices with its powerful JS ES6 based scripting API; Straightforward CLI, sharing many UX aspects with the DevOps tools you already use	Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
Stacks 257	Stacks 12
Followers 226	Followers 40
Votes 56	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Fits nicely in a CI workflow 11 Test scripts are written in javascript 11 Open-source 11 It's code-first 10 Easy to use Cons 3 Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kafka Linux Grafana InfluxDB macOS Datadog Debian Windows JSON	Jenkins Zephyr

What are some alternatives to k6, LoadNinja?

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Related Comparisons

LoadNinja vs k6: What are the differences?

Architecture: LoadNinja is a cloud-based performance testing solution that allows users to run tests from different geographic locations using real browsers, while k6 is an open-source performance testing tool that runs tests locally using virtual users.
Scripting Language: LoadNinja uses a visual scripting language, making it easy for non-technical users to create and modify test scripts without writing any code. On the other hand, k6 uses JavaScript as its scripting language, providing more flexibility and customization options for advanced users.
Scalability: LoadNinja can scale tests to simulate thousands of virtual users without requiring additional hardware or infrastructure setup. k6, on the other hand, relies on the user's local machine for test execution, which may limit the scalability of the tests.
Real User Monitoring: LoadNinja offers real user monitoring capabilities, allowing users to gain insights into the performance of their web application from the perspective of real users. k6 does not provide out-of-the-box real user monitoring features.
Integration with CI/CD: LoadNinja integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, enabling users to incorporate performance testing into their existing continuous integration and deployment processes. k6 also provides integration with CI/CD pipelines but may require more manual configuration and setup.
Pricing Model: LoadNinja follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or yearly fee based on the number of virtual users and test duration. On the other hand, k6 is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective option for small teams or individuals.

LoadNinja vs k6

Overview