Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kali Linux vs Linux: What are the differences?
Kali Linux and Linux, both stemming from the open-source Linux kernel, cater to distinct needs. While Linux is a versatile OS, Kali Linux specializes in cybersecurity. Let's explore the key differences between these two Linux-based platforms.
1. Kernel Modifications: Kali Linux has specialized modifications to its kernel that make it more suitable for penetration testing and security auditing. These modifications include features like IP spoofing and packet sniffing, which are not present in a standard Linux distribution.
2. Pre-installed Tools: Unlike Linux, Kali Linux comes with a wide range of pre-installed tools for advanced security testing and forensics. These tools include network analyzers, password crackers, and vulnerability assessment scanners, which are specifically designed to aid ethical hackers and security professionals.
3. Purpose and Target Audience: Linux is a general-purpose operating system that caters to a wide range of users and use cases. On the other hand, Kali Linux is tailored specifically for cybersecurity professionals and enthusiasts who require specialized tools and features for security testing and pen-testing tasks.
4. Release Cycle and Stability: Linux is known for its stable releases and long-term support (LTS) versions that prioritize reliability and backward compatibility. In contrast, Kali Linux follows a rolling release model, where updates are continuously added, making it more cutting-edge and providing access to the latest tools, but potentially sacrificing stability.
5. Documentation and Support: Linux, being a more widely used operating system, has a vast community and extensive documentation available, catering to a wide range of user needs. Kali Linux, being a niche distribution, has a smaller but dedicated community and specialized documentation focused on security testing and penetration testing.
6. Default Configuration and User Interface: Linux distributions typically have user-friendly interfaces and configurations suitable for general users. In contrast, Kali Linux has a more minimalistic and streamlined user interface, optimized for efficient use of security tools and applications, which may require more technical expertise to operate effectively.
In summary, Kali Linux and Linux, despite a shared kernel, serve unique purposes. Linux is a versatile OS, while Kali Linux is tailored for cybersecurity.
Netdata introduces Linux eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) monitoring. With this enabled, monitor real-time metrics of Linux kernel functions and actions from the very same monitoring and troubleshooting dashboard used for watching entire systems, or even entire infrastructures.
This collector uses eBPF to monitor system calls inside your operating system’s kernel. For now, the main goal of this plugin is to monitor IO and process management on the host where it is running.
If you have a file (demo.txt
) that has 3 columns:
Column-1 Column-2 Column-3
Row-1a Row-2a Row-3a
Row-1b Row-2b Row-3b
Row-1c Row-2c Row-3c
Row-1d Row-2d Row-3d
Row-1e Row-2e Row-3e
and you want to only view the first column of the file in your CLI, run the following:
awk {'print $1'} demo.txt
Column-1
Row-1a
Row-1b
Row-1c
Row-1d
Row-1e
If you want to print the second column of demo.txt
, just replace $1
with $2
Pros of Kali Linux
- Penetration testing tools are pre-installed8
- Has many penetration testing tools8
- Runs on both x86 and ARM platforms5
- Its just debian so it has better support3
- There's no restrictions1
Pros of Linux
- Open Source17
- Free11
- Reliability8
- Safe5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kali Linux
- Wireless driver issues on some systems3
- Packages are too large in size as compare to alpine3
- Outdated versions of common packages3
- Root GUI setup is a potential security hole2