StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Karate DSL vs Kotest

Karate DSL vs Kotest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85
Kotest
Kotest
Stacks12
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks695

Karate DSL vs Kotest: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This Markdown code presents key differences between Karate DSL and Kotest.

1. **Purpose**: Karate DSL is primarily designed for API testing and automation, offering a domain-specific language for writing tests in a readable format. In contrast, Kotest is a flexible and powerful testing framework for JVM languages like Kotlin and Java, supporting various testing styles including unit, integration, and property-based testing.
2. **Language Support**: Karate DSL supports only DSL-based testing where tests are written in Gherkin syntax, making it ideal for BDD-driven testing. On the other hand, Kotest provides support for various testing styles and frameworks such as JUnit, Spek, and Mocha, offering more versatility in test writing approaches.
3. **Integration**: Karate DSL comes with built-in support for HTTP, JSON, XML, and XPath, allowing testers to perform API testing and assertions seamlessly. In comparison, Kotest integrates smoothly with popular libraries and tools such as Spring, Mockk, and Ktor, enabling developers to work with their preferred technologies.
4. **Parallel Execution**: Karate DSL supports parallel test execution out of the box, providing an easy way to run tests concurrently for faster feedback. In contrast, Kotest offers parallel test execution through its test runner, allowing users to configure and control parallelism based on their project requirements.
5. **Documentation**: Karate DSL emphasizes comprehensive documentation and examples to help users get started with API testing quickly and efficiently. While Kotest also provides detailed documentation, it focuses more on the flexibility and extensibility of the framework, encouraging users to customize their testing experience.
6. **Reporting**: Karate DSL includes built-in HTML reports that display test results, logs, and statistics in a user-friendly format, making it easier to track test outcomes. On the other hand, Kotest offers customizable test reports using plugins and extensions, allowing users to tailor reports based on their specific needs.

In Summary, this Markdown code highlights the key differences between Karate DSL and Kotest, focusing on their purpose, language support, integration capabilities, parallel execution, documentation, and reporting features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Kotest
Kotest

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

It is a flexible and comprehensive testing project for Kotlin with multiplatform support.

Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Test whole collections with Inspectors; Reuse test logic for setup or tear down, with Listeners; Make use of custom plugins for integrations with tools such as Pitest; Test Arrow data types with the Arrow extension
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
695
Stacks
148
Stacks
12
Followers
268
Followers
12
Votes
85
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Comprehensive documentation and examples
Cons
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
  • 1
    Karate uses its own scripting language
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
  • 1
    Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Cucumber
Cucumber
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Karate DSL, Kotest?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana