Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keratin AuthN vs Stormpath: What are the differences?
Developers describe Keratin AuthN as "Accounts and Auth Microservice in Go". AuthN manages a database of user accounts with sign-in credentials and related attributes. Your application frontend relies on AuthN for creating accounts, logging in, forgotten passwords, and session maintenance. On the other hand, Stormpath is detailed as "User Management and Authentication for Developers". Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.
Keratin AuthN and Stormpath can be primarily classified as "User Management and Authentication" tools.
Keratin AuthN is an open source tool with 775 GitHub stars and 45 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Keratin AuthN's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Keratin AuthN
Pros of Stormpath
- Authentication27
- User Management22
- API Authentication19
- Token Authentication17
- Security Workflows17
- Secure16
- Easy setup and great support7
- Great customer support7
- they manage the required, so I can focus on innovation6
- Private Deployment3
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance2
- Rapid Development1
- SAML Support0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keratin AuthN
Cons of Stormpath
- Discontinued4