Keratin AuthN vs Userbin

Overview

Userbin

Stacks0

Followers9

Votes0

Keratin AuthN

Stacks0

Followers9

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks111

Keratin AuthN vs Userbin: What are the differences?

Authentication Process: Keratin AuthN follows a simple authentication process where users enter their username and password to validate their identity. In contrast, Userbin offers more advanced authentication methods such as social logins and multi-factor authentication, providing users with additional security options.
Customization Options: Keratin AuthN offers limited customization options for branding and styling the authentication interface. On the other hand, Userbin allows users to fully customize the authentication experience, including the ability to change the look and feel of the login screens to align with their brand identity.
Pricing Model: Keratin AuthN follows a subscription-based pricing model where users pay a flat fee for access to the authentication service. In contrast, Userbin offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to only pay for the specific features they use, providing more flexibility in cost management.
Integration Capabilities: Keratin AuthN provides basic integration capabilities with popular frameworks and libraries, making it easy to implement authentication in various web applications. Userbin, on the other hand, offers more extensive integration options, including SDKs for different programming languages and comprehensive documentation for seamless integration.
User Management Features: Keratin AuthN focuses primarily on authentication and does not offer robust user management features. Userbin, on the other hand, provides a complete user management system that allows administrators to create, manage, and monitor user accounts, providing a more comprehensive solution for user authentication and management.
Scalability and Performance: When it comes to scalability and performance, Userbin offers better scalability options for handling a large number of users and high traffic volumes compared to Keratin AuthN. Userbin's infrastructure is designed to handle spikes in traffic and ensure smooth performance even during peak usage periods.

In Summary, when comparing Keratin AuthN and Userbin, Userbin stands out for its advanced authentication methods, customization options, flexible pricing model, extensive integration capabilities, comprehensive user management features, and superior scalability and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Userbin	Keratin AuthN
Add one line of code to your website to get a login interface that is consistent across all browsers. Start accepting signups and handle logins with no additional HTML or CSS.	AuthN manages a database of user accounts with sign-in credentials and related attributes. Your application frontend relies on AuthN for creating accounts, logging in, forgotten passwords, and session maintenance.
Ready-to-go UI. No need to design login forms from scratch. The in-page, customizable popup integrates seamlessly with your website.;Social Login. Enable login with Facebook and Github without additional coding. Easily build apps on 3rd party data.;Actionable Metrics. With no extra setup, Userbin gives you access to the most important user metrics from day one.;Customizable login widget, social login, analytics, user managements, automated emails, cloud-based storage	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 111
Stacks 0	Stacks 0
Followers 9	Followers 9
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Ruby JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Userbin, Keratin AuthN?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Keratin AuthN vs Userbin: What are the differences?

Authentication Process: Keratin AuthN follows a simple authentication process where users enter their username and password to validate their identity. In contrast, Userbin offers more advanced authentication methods such as social logins and multi-factor authentication, providing users with additional security options.
Customization Options: Keratin AuthN offers limited customization options for branding and styling the authentication interface. On the other hand, Userbin allows users to fully customize the authentication experience, including the ability to change the look and feel of the login screens to align with their brand identity.
Pricing Model: Keratin AuthN follows a subscription-based pricing model where users pay a flat fee for access to the authentication service. In contrast, Userbin offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to only pay for the specific features they use, providing more flexibility in cost management.
Integration Capabilities: Keratin AuthN provides basic integration capabilities with popular frameworks and libraries, making it easy to implement authentication in various web applications. Userbin, on the other hand, offers more extensive integration options, including SDKs for different programming languages and comprehensive documentation for seamless integration.
User Management Features: Keratin AuthN focuses primarily on authentication and does not offer robust user management features. Userbin, on the other hand, provides a complete user management system that allows administrators to create, manage, and monitor user accounts, providing a more comprehensive solution for user authentication and management.
Scalability and Performance: When it comes to scalability and performance, Userbin offers better scalability options for handling a large number of users and high traffic volumes compared to Keratin AuthN. Userbin's infrastructure is designed to handle spikes in traffic and ensure smooth performance even during peak usage periods.

Keratin AuthN vs Userbin

Overview