StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Kestrel vs WCF

Kestrel vs WCF

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kestrel
Kestrel
Stacks37
Followers58
Votes0
WCF
WCF
Stacks125
Followers107
Votes5

Kestrel vs WCF: What are the differences?

Introduction

When considering web development technologies, it's essential to understand the key differences between Kestrel and WCF.

  1. Protocol Support: Kestrel is an open-source web server developed by the ASP.NET Core team, and it supports HTTP/2 and HTTPS by default. On the other hand, Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) is a framework for building service-oriented applications, primarily supporting SOAP-based protocols.

  2. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Kestrel is designed to run on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a more versatile option for developers looking to deploy their applications on a variety of operating systems. In contrast, WCF is primarily targeted towards Windows environments, limiting its cross-platform compatibility.

  3. Hosting Model: Kestrel is a lightweight, standalone web server that can be used in combination with other servers like IIS or Nginx for additional features such as load balancing and reverse proxying. On the other hand, WCF relies on the Windows Process Activation Service (WAS) for hosting, which may introduce additional overhead and complexities in the deployment process.

Summary

In summary, Kestrel offers protocol support, cross-platform compatibility, and a lightweight hosting model compared to WCF, making it a more modern and versatile choice for web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kestrel
Kestrel
WCF
WCF

Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM.

It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.

Written by Robey Pointer;Starling clone written in Scala (a port of Starling from Ruby to Scala);Queues are stored in memory, but logged on disk
-
Statistics
Stacks
37
Stacks
125
Followers
58
Followers
107
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Classes

What are some alternatives to Kestrel, WCF?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase