StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs SimpleSAMLphp

Keycloak vs SimpleSAMLphp

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SimpleSAMLphp
SimpleSAMLphp
Stacks11
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks697
Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102

Keycloak vs SimpleSAMLphp: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Keycloak and SimpleSAMLphp

Keycloak and SimpleSAMLphp are both open-source identity and access management solutions, but there are several key differences between them:

  1. Authentication methods: Keycloak supports a wide range of authentication methods, including social login, multi-factor authentication, and passwordless authentication. On the other hand, SimpleSAMLphp mainly focuses on traditional username/password authentication and SAML-based federation.

  2. Support for protocols: Keycloak supports multiple protocols such as SAML, OpenID Connect, OAuth, and more. SimpleSAMLphp, as the name suggests, primarily focuses on SAML protocol for identity federation. It provides extensive support for SAML features and profiles.

  3. User management: Keycloak provides a comprehensive user management interface with support for user self-registration, password reset, and user roles/permissions. SimpleSAMLphp has limited built-in user management capabilities and usually relies on external user management systems or identity providers.

  4. Integration with external systems: Keycloak offers out-of-the-box integration with various external systems like LDAP, Active Directory, and databases. SimpleSAMLphp also supports integration with external systems but requires more manual configuration and customization.

  5. Extensibility and customization: Keycloak provides a highly extensible platform where developers can customize its behavior and add new features using Java APIs and extensions. SimpleSAMLphp offers customization options through PHP programming, but it may require more effort and expertise compared to Keycloak.

  6. Community and support: Keycloak has a vibrant community of users and developers, backed by the Red Hat organization. It offers professional support and regular updates. SimpleSAMLphp also has an active community, but it may be relatively smaller and have limited support options.

In summary, Keycloak provides a more comprehensive and versatile solution with support for a wide range of authentication methods, protocols, and integrations, along with extensive customization options. SimpleSAMLphp, on the other hand, is a specialized solution primarily focused on SAML-based federation and may be a suitable choice for organizations with specific SAML requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SimpleSAMLphp, Keycloak

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SimpleSAMLphp
SimpleSAMLphp
Keycloak
Keycloak

It is an award-winning application written in native PHP that deals with authentication. It supports some other identity protocols and frameworks, such as Shibboleth 1.3, A-Select, CAS, OpenID, WS-Federation or OAuth, and is easily extendable, so you can develop your own modules if you like.

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Large user base; Tested with several other federation software implementations
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
697
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11
Stacks
780
Followers
22
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
Integrations
PHP
PHP
OAuth.io
OAuth.io
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SimpleSAMLphp, Keycloak?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope