Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
KeystoneJS vs Sails.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
When choosing between KeystoneJS and Sails.js for building web applications, it is important to understand the key differences between the two frameworks in order to make an informed decision.
Database Support: KeystoneJS is built on top of MongoDB and Mongoose, making it a powerful choice for projects that require NoSQL database capabilities. Sails.js, on the other hand, provides support for multiple databases including MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB, giving developers more flexibility in choosing the right database for their project.
Admin Interface: KeystoneJS comes with a built-in Admin UI that allows developers to easily create and manage database content without writing custom code. Sails.js does not have a built-in admin interface, requiring developers to create their own dashboard or use third-party solutions.
Real-time Communication: Sails.js provides built-in support for real-time communication through WebSockets, making it a great choice for applications that require real-time updates and notifications. KeystoneJS does not have native support for real-time communication, requiring developers to integrate third-party libraries for WebSocket support.
Customization and Flexibility: Sails.js offers more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility, allowing developers to configure the framework to fit their specific needs. KeystoneJS, while providing a robust set of features out of the box, may be less flexible for developers looking to make extensive customizations.
Community and Ecosystem: Sails.js has a larger and more active community compared to KeystoneJS, providing developers with access to a wealth of resources, plugins, and tutorials. This can be beneficial for developers who need peer support and guidance while working on their projects.
Performance and Scalability: Sails.js is known for its performance and scalability, making it a suitable choice for high-traffic applications that require fast response times. KeystoneJS, while efficient in many scenarios, may not be as optimized for performance-critical applications.
In Summary, understanding the key differences between KeystoneJS and Sails.js can help developers make an informed decision based on their specific project requirements and preferences.
Pros of KeystoneJS
- Out-of-box tools and basic services7
- Large community3
- Great schema-based auto-generated admin interface2
- Great CMS and API platform2
- Great sandbox to play with nodejs2
- Great integrations1
- A great MEAN stack1
- Detail documentations and tutorials1
- Free1
- Rapid development1
- Open source1
- "easy setup", "uses mongodb"1
- Fast on V81
- Similar to wordpress1
- Fast growing community cms framework1
- Great culture1
Pros of Sails.js
- Data-driven apis49
- Waterline ORM47
- Mvc37
- Easy rest32
- Real-time25
- Open source21
- Service-oriented architecture19
- Scalable18
- Convension over configuration10
- Rails-like asset pipeline9
- Node machines and machinepacks9
- Easy route/controller generation7
- Ruby on Rails basic stuff for JS devs6
- CLI for scaffolding project pieces3
- WebSocket support3
- Supportive community1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of KeystoneJS
Cons of Sails.js
- Waterline ORM5
- Defaults to VueJS4
- Standard MVC0