StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Kibana vs Power BI

Kibana vs Power BI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kibana
Kibana
Stacks20.6K
Followers16.4K
Votes262
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks8.5K
Power BI
Power BI
Stacks994
Followers946
Votes29

Kibana vs Power BI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Kibana and Power BI are both popular tools used for data visualization and analysis. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Storage and Data Sources: Kibana primarily works with Elasticsearch for storage and data retrieval, while Power BI supports a wide range of data sources including databases, Excel files, cloud services, etc. This difference in data sources gives Power BI an advantage when it comes to integrating data from various systems.

  2. Data Modeling and Transformations: Power BI offers a comprehensive data modeling capability, allowing users to define relationships and perform complex transformations using Power Query. Kibana, on the other hand, focuses more on visualizing data and does not offer extensive data modeling or transformation features. This makes Power BI a better choice for users who need advanced data preparation capabilities.

  3. Embedded Analytics: Power BI enables easy embedding of reports and dashboards into other applications or websites using its Embedded API. Kibana also provides embedding options but requires additional configuration and knowledge of programming languages like JavaScript. Power BI's straightforward embedding process makes it a preferred choice when it comes to building integrated solutions.

  4. Advanced Analytics: Power BI offers built-in advanced analytics functionalities such as forecasting, clustering, and sentiment analysis through its integration with Azure Machine Learning. While Kibana supports some advanced analytics features, it requires the use of additional plugins and extensions. Power BI's native advanced analytics capabilities make it a more robust tool for data analysis.

  5. Collaboration and Sharing: Power BI provides seamless collaboration and sharing options, allowing users to collaborate on reports and dashboards in real-time, create alerts, and share content with specific individuals or groups. Kibana, although it supports basic sharing features, falls behind in terms of collaborative functionalities. Power BI's collaboration features make it more suitable for team collaboration and sharing.

  6. Pricing Model: Kibana is part of the Elastic Stack, which is available as open-source software, making it free to use. However, certain features and functionalities may require a license. Power BI, on the other hand, offers both free and paid versions, with the free version having limitations on data storage, refresh rates, and collaboration features. Power BI's pricing model provides more flexibility, whether users require a free solution or need to access premium features.

**In Summary, Kibana primarily works with Elasticsearch, lacks advanced data modeling capabilities, requires more effort for embedding and collaboration, and may require additional licensing for certain features. Power BI supports versatile data sources, provides extensive data modeling capabilities, offers straightforward embedding and collaboration options, includes advanced analytics features, and has a more flexible pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kibana, Power BI

matteo1989it
matteo1989it

Jun 26, 2019

ReviewonKibanaKibanaGrafanaGrafanaElasticsearchElasticsearch

I use both Kibana and Grafana on my workplace: Kibana for logging and Grafana for monitoring. Since you already work with Elasticsearch, I think Kibana is the safest choice in terms of ease of use and variety of messages it can manage, while Grafana has still (in my opinion) a strong link to metrics

757k views757k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Jun 25, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."

663k views663k
Comments
abrahamfathman
abrahamfathman

Jun 26, 2019

ReviewonKibanaKibanaSplunkSplunkGrafanaGrafana

I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.

2.29M views2.29M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kibana
Kibana
Power BI
Power BI

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

It aims to provide interactive visualizations and business intelligence capabilities with an interface simple enough for end users to create their own reports and dashboards.

Flexible analytics and visualization platform;Real-time summary and charting of streaming data;Intuitive interface for a variety of users;Instant sharing and embedding of dashboards
Get self-service analytics at enterprise scale; Use smart tools for strong results; Help protect your analytics data
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
20.6K
Stacks
994
Followers
16.4K
Followers
946
Votes
262
Votes
29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Easy to setup
  • 65
    Free
  • 45
    Can search text
  • 21
    Has pie chart
  • 13
    X-axis is not restricted to timestamp
Cons
  • 7
    Unintuituve
  • 4
    Elasticsearch is huge
  • 4
    Works on top of elastic only
  • 3
    Hardweight UI
Pros
  • 18
    Cross-filtering
  • 4
    Database visualisation
  • 2
    Intuitive and complete internal ETL
  • 2
    Access from anywhere
  • 2
    Powerful Calculation Engine
Integrations
Logstash
Logstash
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Beats
Beats
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel

What are some alternatives to Kibana, Power BI?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp