Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kong

642
1.5K
+ 1
139
Mashery

13
26
+ 1
2
Add tool

Kong vs Mashery: What are the differences?

Kong and Mashery are both API management platforms used to control and manage APIs. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Integration with different infrastructure: Kong is built on top of Nginx and can be deployed on any infrastructure including on-premise, cloud, or hybrid. On the other hand, Mashery is a cloud-native API management solution owned by TIBCO and primarily operates in the cloud environment.

  2. Open-source vs proprietary: Kong is an open-source API gateway that offers a free community edition with basic features and a paid enterprise edition with additional functionalities. Mashery, on the contrary, is a proprietary solution with its features and capabilities limited to what is provided by the vendor.

  3. Flexibility and customization: Kong allows more flexibility and customization through its plugin architecture, which allows developers to extend its functionalities and integrate with other services or systems easily. Mashery, on the other hand, provides less room for customization and relies more on the out-of-the-box features provided by the vendor.

  4. Developer community and ecosystem: Kong has a large and active open-source community that constantly contributes to the platform's development and improvement. This results in a wide range of available plugin options and frequent updates. Mashery, being a proprietary solution, has a smaller developer community and limited ecosystem in comparison.

  5. Deployment options: Kong offers multiple deployment options, including Docker, Kubernetes, and VM-based installations. This provides flexibility and adaptability to different infrastructure requirements. Mashery, being a cloud-native solution, primarily operates in the cloud and may have limitations when it comes to on-premise or hybrid deployments.

  6. Pricing model: Kong's pricing model is based on a subscription and usage-based model, with different tiers available for different levels of support, performance, and features. Mashery, on the other hand, follows a traditional license-based pricing model, which may not be as flexible or scalable for organizations with varying needs.

In Summary, Kong offers more flexibility, customization options, and a larger developer community compared to Mashery, while Mashery provides a cloud-native solution with a more streamlined and controlled environment.

Decisions about Kong and Mashery
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 309.3K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kong
Pros of Mashery
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
  • 4
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Kubernetes-native
  • 2
    Security
  • 2
    Has a good plugin infrastructure
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 1
    Load balancing
  • 1
    Documentation is clear
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 1
    Hard to use
  • 1
    Cheese-like

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Kong?

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

What is Mashery?

Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Kong?
What companies use Mashery?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kong?
What tools integrate with Mashery?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+26
    29
    16121
    What are some alternatives to Kong and Mashery?
    Apigee
    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
    Postman
    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
    Postman
    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
    Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming.
    Google Maps
    Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.
    See all alternatives