Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kong

642
1.5K
+ 1
139
seneca

28
42
+ 1
2
Add tool

Kong vs seneca: What are the differences?

Introduction: Kong and Seneca are two popular tools used in the development of microservices architecture. Understanding the key differences between Kong and Seneca can help developers make informed decisions on which tool best suits their project requirements.

  1. Protocol Support: Kong is an API Gateway that supports various protocols like HTTP, TCP, and WebSockets, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases. On the other hand, Seneca is a microservices toolkit that primarily focuses on inter-service communication within a single system, making it ideal for internal communication between microservices.

  2. Plugin Ecosystem: Kong has a robust plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend functionalities such as authentication, logging, and rate limiting easily. Seneca, on the other hand, lacks a built-in plugin system, requiring developers to write custom code for implementing additional features.

  3. API Management Features: Kong provides features for API management, such as API rate limiting, analytics, and authentication out of the box, making it a comprehensive solution for managing APIs. Seneca, on the other hand, does not have native API management capabilities and requires additional integration with tools like Kong or Apigee for these features.

  4. Scalability: Kong is built for high performance and scalability, making it suitable for managing large volumes of API requests and traffic. Seneca, being a toolkit for microservices, may require additional configurations and optimizations for scaling to handle high loads efficiently.

  5. Ease of Use: Kong offers a user-friendly interface and easy configuration options, making it straightforward for developers to set up and manage APIs. Seneca, being more focused on microservices development, requires a deeper understanding of its programming model and may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  6. Community Support: Kong has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-contributed plugins available for users. Seneca, while having a dedicated user base, may have limited resources and community support compared to Kong.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Kong and Seneca, such as protocol support, plugin ecosystem, API management features, scalability, ease of use, and community support, can help developers make informed decisions when choosing a tool for their microservices architecture.

Decisions about Kong and seneca
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 309.9K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kong
Pros of seneca
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
  • 4
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Kubernetes-native
  • 2
    Security
  • 2
    Has a good plugin infrastructure
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 1
    Load balancing
  • 1
    Documentation is clear
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 2
    Multi transports support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Kong?

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

What is seneca?

Seneca is a toolkit for organizing the business logic of your app. You can break down your app into "stuff that happens", rather than focusing on data models or managing dependencies.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Kong?
What companies use seneca?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kong?
What tools integrate with seneca?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubPythonNode.js+26
29
16126
What are some alternatives to Kong and seneca?
Apigee
API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Postman
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming.
Google Maps
Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.
See all alternatives