Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kong vs Zookeeper: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Kong and Zookeeper
1. Kong: API Gateway and Microservice Management Tool
Kong is an open-source API gateway and microservices management tool that acts as an intermediary between clients and backend services. It offers functionalities like load balancing, authentication, rate limiting, and request/response transformations. Kong simplifies the process of managing and securing APIs, making it easier to build scalable and robust microservice architectures.
2. Zookeeper: Distributed Coordination Service
Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that provides a reliable and consistent mechanism for synchronizing distributed systems. It is designed to handle coordination tasks such as distributed locking, configuration management, and service discovery. Zookeeper offers a hierarchical namespace and provides notification mechanisms to inform clients about changes in the distributed system.
3. Kong: Language-agnostic Platform
Kong is built using the Lua programming language, but it supports plugins and extensions that allow developers to write custom logic and functionality using different programming languages. This makes Kong a flexible and language-agnostic platform that can integrate with various systems and services.
4. Zookeeper: Strong Consistency and Sequential Consistency Model
Zookeeper provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all clients see the same view of the distributed system at the same time. It also offers a sequential consistency model, which means that all updates from a client are applied in the order they were received, preserving the order of operations.
5. Kong: Focus on API Management and Developer Experience
Kong is primarily focused on API management and developer experience. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing APIs, allows developers to version their APIs, and offers detailed analytics and monitoring capabilities. Kong also supports developer self-service, allowing developers to access and manage their APIs without relying on manual configuration.
6. Zookeeper: Centralized Configuration and Coordination
Zookeeper serves as a centralized configuration and coordination service for distributed systems. It allows clients to store and retrieve configuration data, making it easier to maintain consistency across multiple nodes. Zookeeper's coordination features, such as distributed locking and leader election, facilitate synchronization and cooperation among different components of a distributed system.
In summary, Kong is an API gateway and microservices management tool that focuses on API management and provides support for various programming languages. On the other hand, Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that offers strong consistency guarantees and centralized configuration and coordination capabilities for distributed systems.
Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.
Pros of Kong
- Easy to maintain37
- Easy to install32
- Flexible26
- Great performance21
- Api blueprint7
- Custom Plugins4
- Kubernetes-native3
- Security2
- Has a good plugin infrastructure2
- Agnostic2
- Load balancing1
- Documentation is clear1
- Very customizable1
Pros of Zookeeper
- High performance ,easy to generate node specific config11
- Java8
- Kafka support8
- Spring Boot Support5
- Supports extensive distributed IPC3
- Curator2
- Used in ClickHouse2
- Supports DC/OS2
- Used in Hadoop1
- Embeddable In Java Service1