Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kong

624
1.5K
+ 1
139
Zookeeper

787
1K
+ 1
43
Add tool

Kong vs Zookeeper: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Kong and Zookeeper

1. Kong: API Gateway and Microservice Management Tool

Kong is an open-source API gateway and microservices management tool that acts as an intermediary between clients and backend services. It offers functionalities like load balancing, authentication, rate limiting, and request/response transformations. Kong simplifies the process of managing and securing APIs, making it easier to build scalable and robust microservice architectures.

2. Zookeeper: Distributed Coordination Service

Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that provides a reliable and consistent mechanism for synchronizing distributed systems. It is designed to handle coordination tasks such as distributed locking, configuration management, and service discovery. Zookeeper offers a hierarchical namespace and provides notification mechanisms to inform clients about changes in the distributed system.

3. Kong: Language-agnostic Platform

Kong is built using the Lua programming language, but it supports plugins and extensions that allow developers to write custom logic and functionality using different programming languages. This makes Kong a flexible and language-agnostic platform that can integrate with various systems and services.

4. Zookeeper: Strong Consistency and Sequential Consistency Model

Zookeeper provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all clients see the same view of the distributed system at the same time. It also offers a sequential consistency model, which means that all updates from a client are applied in the order they were received, preserving the order of operations.

5. Kong: Focus on API Management and Developer Experience

Kong is primarily focused on API management and developer experience. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing APIs, allows developers to version their APIs, and offers detailed analytics and monitoring capabilities. Kong also supports developer self-service, allowing developers to access and manage their APIs without relying on manual configuration.

6. Zookeeper: Centralized Configuration and Coordination

Zookeeper serves as a centralized configuration and coordination service for distributed systems. It allows clients to store and retrieve configuration data, making it easier to maintain consistency across multiple nodes. Zookeeper's coordination features, such as distributed locking and leader election, facilitate synchronization and cooperation among different components of a distributed system.

In summary, Kong is an API gateway and microservices management tool that focuses on API management and provides support for various programming languages. On the other hand, Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service that offers strong consistency guarantees and centralized configuration and coordination capabilities for distributed systems.

Decisions about Kong and Zookeeper
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 290.7K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Kong
Pros of Zookeeper
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
  • 4
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Kubernetes-native
  • 2
    Security
  • 2
    Has a good plugin infrastructure
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 1
    Load balancing
  • 1
    Documentation is clear
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 11
    High performance ,easy to generate node specific config
  • 8
    Java
  • 8
    Kafka support
  • 5
    Spring Boot Support
  • 3
    Supports extensive distributed IPC
  • 2
    Curator
  • 2
    Used in ClickHouse
  • 2
    Supports DC/OS
  • 1
    Used in Hadoop
  • 1
    Embeddable In Java Service

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Kong?

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

What is Zookeeper?

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Kong?
What companies use Zookeeper?
See which teams inside your own company are using Kong or Zookeeper.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kong?
What tools integrate with Zookeeper?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Amazon S3KafkaZookeeper+5
8
1565
May 6 2020 at 6:34AM

Pinterest

JavaScriptC++Varnish+6
5
3365
GitHubPythonNode.js+26
29
15958
What are some alternatives to Kong and Zookeeper?
Apigee
API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
Ambassador
Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.
Azure API Management
Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. Streamline your work across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with a single place for managing all your APIs.
Tyk Cloud
Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.
See all alternatives