SwiftLint vs ktlint

Overview

SwiftLint

Stacks156

Followers105

Votes0

GitHub Stars19.3K

Forks2.3K

ktlint

Stacks16

Followers14

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.6K

Forks518

SwiftLint vs ktlint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing SwiftLint and ktlint, there are key differences that developers should consider based on the programming language they are working with.

Language Support: SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift, which is the programming language for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. On the other hand, ktlint is intended for Kotlin, primarily used for Android app development. Therefore, developers need to choose the tool that aligns with the language they are working with.
Configuration Flexibility: SwiftLint offers more configuration options and rules customization compared to ktlint. With SwiftLint, developers can tailor the linting rules to best fit their coding style and project requirements, providing more flexibility in coding standards enforcement.
Community and Documentation: SwiftLint has a larger and more active community compared to ktlint. This leads to better support, frequent updates, and more extensive documentation available for SwiftLint users. Developers may find it easier to find solutions to common issues or seek help within a larger community.
Integration with Build Systems: SwiftLint offers better integration with popular build systems like Xcode and various CI/CD pipelines, making it easier for developers to incorporate linting in their development workflow seamlessly. ktlint may have fewer integrations with build systems, requiring extra effort for setup and maintenance.
Development Environment Support: SwiftLint is well-supported in popular development environments for Swift programming, such as Xcode and other IDEs. ktlint may not have the same level of support in all Kotlin development environments, which can impact the ease of use for developers working with those environments.
Rule Sets and Customization: SwiftLint provides a wider range of default rule sets and allows for more granular customization of rules compared to ktlint. This granular control over linting rules in SwiftLint can help developers enforce specific coding standards or best practices unique to their projects.

In Summary, when choosing between SwiftLint and ktlint, consider factors like language support, configuration flexibility, community engagement, integration with build systems, development environment support, and rule sets customization to determine the best fit for your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SwiftLint	ktlint
It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.	An anti-bikeshedding Kotlin linter with built-in formatter.
automatically correct certain violations; supports nesting configuration files	No configuration; Built-in formatter; Customizable output; A single executable jar with all dependencies included
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.3K	GitHub Stars 6.6K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 518
Stacks 156	Stacks 16
Followers 105	Followers 14
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Xcode Jenkins macOS	Kotlin

What are some alternatives to SwiftLint, ktlint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

SwiftLint vs ktlint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing SwiftLint and ktlint, there are key differences that developers should consider based on the programming language they are working with.

Language Support: SwiftLint is specifically designed for Swift, which is the programming language for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. On the other hand, ktlint is intended for Kotlin, primarily used for Android app development. Therefore, developers need to choose the tool that aligns with the language they are working with.
Configuration Flexibility: SwiftLint offers more configuration options and rules customization compared to ktlint. With SwiftLint, developers can tailor the linting rules to best fit their coding style and project requirements, providing more flexibility in coding standards enforcement.
Community and Documentation: SwiftLint has a larger and more active community compared to ktlint. This leads to better support, frequent updates, and more extensive documentation available for SwiftLint users. Developers may find it easier to find solutions to common issues or seek help within a larger community.
Integration with Build Systems: SwiftLint offers better integration with popular build systems like Xcode and various CI/CD pipelines, making it easier for developers to incorporate linting in their development workflow seamlessly. ktlint may have fewer integrations with build systems, requiring extra effort for setup and maintenance.
Development Environment Support: SwiftLint is well-supported in popular development environments for Swift programming, such as Xcode and other IDEs. ktlint may not have the same level of support in all Kotlin development environments, which can impact the ease of use for developers working with those environments.
Rule Sets and Customization: SwiftLint provides a wider range of default rule sets and allows for more granular customization of rules compared to ktlint. This granular control over linting rules in SwiftLint can help developers enforce specific coding standards or best practices unique to their projects.

SwiftLint vs ktlint

Overview