Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Batch vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare AWS Batch and Kubernetes, two popular technologies for managing containerized workloads.
Scalability and Elasticity: AWS Batch is a fully managed service that automatically provisions and scales compute resources based on the workload submitted, allowing you to dynamically adjust resources as needed. In contrast, Kubernetes requires manual configuration and scaling of nodes to handle workload demands.
Job Scheduling and Management: AWS Batch provides a job queueing system that handles the scheduling and resource management for executing batch computing workloads. It allows you to define job dependencies, priorities, and constraints. Kubernetes, on the other hand, is a container orchestration platform that primarily focuses on managing and scheduling long-running services rather than batch jobs.
Container Lifecycle Management: Kubernetes has a powerful set of tools for managing the lifecycle of containers, including rolling updates, self-healing, and scaling based on metrics. AWS Batch, while it also supports containers, does not provide the same level of control and automation for container lifecycle management.
Ease of Use and Deployment: AWS Batch is a fully managed service that abstracts away the underlying infrastructure, making it easier to get started and deploy batch workloads. Kubernetes, on the other hand, requires manual setup and configuration of the cluster, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Integration with Other Services: AWS Batch seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon S3, DynamoDB, and CloudWatch, allowing you to easily incorporate these services into your batch jobs. While Kubernetes can also integrate with various services, it requires additional setup and configuration.
Cost Management: AWS Batch offers cost optimization features like spot instances that allow you to use available unused EC2 instances at a lower cost. Kubernetes does not provide such built-in cost management features, requiring manual optimization efforts to keep costs under control.
In summary, AWS Batch provides a fully managed solution with seamless integration to other AWS services and ease of use, while Kubernetes offers more control and flexibility in managing containerized services with powerful lifecycle management capabilities.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of AWS Batch
- Containerized3
- Scalable3
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS Batch
- More overhead than lambda3
- Image management1
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1