Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

LambdaTest

538
198
+ 1
204
Selenium

15.4K
12.3K
+ 1
525
Add tool

LambdaTest vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

LambdaTest and Selenium are both popular tools used for automated website testing. While both tools serve the same purpose, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other. In this analysis, we will explore the main differences between LambdaTest and Selenium.

  1. Pricing Model: One major difference between LambdaTest and Selenium is their pricing models. LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly or annual fee to access the platform's features and services. On the other hand, Selenium is an open-source tool that is available for free to users, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses on a tight budget.

  2. Platform Coverage: Another key difference between LambdaTest and Selenium is their platform coverage. LambdaTest provides a cloud-based testing platform that supports a wide range of operating systems, browsers, and mobile devices, allowing users to test their websites across different platforms easily. Selenium, being an open-source tool, does not offer the same level of platform coverage out of the box and may require additional configuration and setup to test on different platforms.

  3. Built-in Integrations: LambdaTest provides built-in integrations with popular project management and collaboration tools such as Jira, Asana, Trello, and Slack. This allows users to seamlessly integrate their testing processes with their existing workflows and ensures smooth communication between team members. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide these built-in integrations, necessitating users to rely on third-party plugins or custom development to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Parallel Testing: Parallel testing is a feature that allows users to execute multiple tests simultaneously, reducing the overall testing time. LambdaTest offers built-in parallel testing capabilities, allowing users to execute tests across multiple browsers, operating systems, and devices in parallel. However, Selenium does not offer parallel testing functionality out of the box and requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel testing.

  5. Documentation and Support: LambdaTest provides detailed documentation, tutorials, and dedicated customer support to help users get started and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter during their testing process. Selenium, being an open-source tool, relies on community support and documentation, which may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly as the dedicated support offered by LambdaTest.

  6. Scalability: LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that offers scalable infrastructure, allowing users to scale their testing efforts according to their needs. This means that users can easily increase or decrease their testing resources as required, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency. Selenium, being an open-source tool, does not provide the same level of scalability and may require additional infrastructure setup and management to accommodate high-volume testing.

In summary, LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model, provides extensive platform coverage, offers built-in integrations, supports parallel testing, provides comprehensive documentation and support, and offers scalability, making it a user-friendly and versatile choice for automated website testing. Selenium, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is cost-effective, requires additional configuration for platform coverage, lacks built-in integrations, does not offer parallel testing functionality out of the box, relies on community support, and may require additional setup for scalability.

Advice on LambdaTest and Selenium
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 215.5K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of LambdaTest
Pros of Selenium
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
  • 175
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of LambdaTest
Cons of Selenium
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is LambdaTest?

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

What is Selenium?

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use LambdaTest?
What companies use Selenium?
See which teams inside your own company are using LambdaTest or Selenium.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with LambdaTest?
What tools integrate with Selenium?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest and Selenium?
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Sauce Labs
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
Playwright
It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.
See all alternatives