LambdaTest vs WebdriverIO

Overview

WebdriverIO

Stacks426

Followers509

Votes40

GitHub Stars9.7K

Forks2.6K

LambdaTest

Stacks556

Followers198

Votes204

LambdaTest vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between LambdaTest and WebdriverIO.

Testing Capabilities: LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to perform cross-browser testing, geolocation testing, responsive testing, and visual regression testing. WebdriverIO, on the other hand, is a testing framework that provides the ability to automate web applications using the WebDriver protocol.
Community Support: WebdriverIO has a larger community support base compared to LambdaTest, which means a wider range of resources, tutorials, and plugins are available to users seeking assistance with their automation testing projects.
Integration with CI/CD tools: Both LambdaTest and WebdriverIO can be easily integrated with popular Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI. However, WebdriverIO offers more flexibility in this aspect by having a wider range of built-in integrations with these tools.
Pricing Model: LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the number of users and parallel tests. On the other hand, WebdriverIO is an open-source tool and free to use, making it a budget-friendly option for those looking to automate their testing without incurring additional costs.
Programming Language Support: WebdriverIO supports different programming languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, while LambdaTest primarily focuses on providing a platform-agnostic solution for testing, making it easier for users to choose their preferred programming language for test automation.
Browser Support: LambdaTest offers access to a wide range of desktop and mobile browsers and operating systems for testing purposes. In comparison, WebdriverIO supports automation across multiple browsers but may require additional configurations to access a similar variety of browser environments as LambdaTest.

In Summary, LambdaTest offers comprehensive testing capabilities and integration options with a subscription-based pricing model, while WebdriverIO stands out with its extensive community support and open-source nature.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WebdriverIO, LambdaTest

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebdriverIO	LambdaTest
WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.	LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.
Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface	Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 426	Stacks 556
Followers 509	Followers 198
Votes 40	Votes 204
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs 10 Open Source 8 Great community 7 Easy to setup 4 Best solution for broad browser support Cons 8 High maintenance	Pros 17 Pocket friendly pricing 13 Good Performance 12 Integration with Bitbucket 12 Cross browser testing 12 Integration with Gitlab Cons 1 Limited device support 1 Steep learning curve for new users 1 Cluttered UI
Integrations
Node.js Selenium	Zoho Bugtracker GitLab Katalon Studio RSpec Jira PractiTest AngularJS JUnit TestCafe Appium

What are some alternatives to WebdriverIO, LambdaTest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Autify

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Related Comparisons

LambdaTest vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between LambdaTest and WebdriverIO.

Testing Capabilities: LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to perform cross-browser testing, geolocation testing, responsive testing, and visual regression testing. WebdriverIO, on the other hand, is a testing framework that provides the ability to automate web applications using the WebDriver protocol.
Community Support: WebdriverIO has a larger community support base compared to LambdaTest, which means a wider range of resources, tutorials, and plugins are available to users seeking assistance with their automation testing projects.
Integration with CI/CD tools: Both LambdaTest and WebdriverIO can be easily integrated with popular Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI. However, WebdriverIO offers more flexibility in this aspect by having a wider range of built-in integrations with these tools.
Pricing Model: LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on the number of users and parallel tests. On the other hand, WebdriverIO is an open-source tool and free to use, making it a budget-friendly option for those looking to automate their testing without incurring additional costs.
Programming Language Support: WebdriverIO supports different programming languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, while LambdaTest primarily focuses on providing a platform-agnostic solution for testing, making it easier for users to choose their preferred programming language for test automation.
Browser Support: LambdaTest offers access to a wide range of desktop and mobile browsers and operating systems for testing purposes. In comparison, WebdriverIO supports automation across multiple browsers but may require additional configurations to access a similar variety of browser environments as LambdaTest.

LambdaTest vs WebdriverIO

Overview

LambdaTest vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?