Laravel vs Trailblazer

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.7K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

Trailblazer

Stacks15

Followers25

Votes13

Laravel vs Trailblazer: What are the differences?

Routing and Controllers: Laravel uses a traditional MVC architecture with routes and controllers, making it easier for developers to structure their applications. In contrast, Trailblazer is designed for domain-driven design (DDD) and uses operation objects for defining business logic, which can provide more flexibility and organization in complex applications.
Code Organization: Laravel encourages developers to organize their code using models, views, and controllers, following the MVC pattern. Trailblazer, on the other hand, promotes the concepts of "concepts," which are reusable and configurable building blocks for defining business logic, leading to a more modular and testable codebase.
Form Handling: Laravel provides form requests for validating user input, while Trailblazer focuses on form objects that encapsulate the logic for handling form submissions. This approach in Trailblazer helps in separating concerns and keeping the application more maintainable.
Authentication and Authorization: Laravel comes with built-in authentication and authorization features, making it easier to implement user authentication and access control. Trailblazer, on the other hand, is more focused on business logic and does not offer out-of-the-box solutions for authentication and authorization, which may require additional configuration and customization.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Laravel has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and packages available to extend its functionality. Trailblazer, being a less popular framework, may have a smaller community and limited resources, which can impact the availability of support and third-party integrations.
Learning Curve: While Laravel is known for its ease of use and beginner-friendly nature, Trailblazer has a steeper learning curve due to its unique concepts and principles. Developers familiar with traditional MVC frameworks may find it challenging to adapt to Trailblazer's domain-driven design approach.

In Summary, Laravel and Trailblazer differ in their architectural patterns, code organization, form handling, authentication mechanisms, community support, and learning curves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, Trailblazer

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	Trailblazer
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	Trailblazer is a thin layer on top of Rails. It gently enforces encapsulation, an intuitive code structure and gives you an object-oriented architecture. In a nutshell: Trailblazer makes you write logicless models that purely act as data objects, don't contain callbacks, nested attributes, validations or domain logic. It removes bulky controllers and strong_parameters by supplying additional layers to hold that code and completely replaces helpers.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 15
Followers 23.7K	Followers 25
Votes 3.9K	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
Pros 555 Clean architecture 392 Growing community 370 Composer friendly 344 Open source 325 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 5 Trailblazer allows creating sane, large apps in Rails 3 Separates business logic from framework 2 Improves maintainability 2 Sound Software Architecture principals 1 Makes Rails better Cons 1 Hasn't been on Thoughtworks radar since 2014
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	Ruby Rails

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Trailblazer?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Laravel vs Trailblazer: What are the differences?

Routing and Controllers: Laravel uses a traditional MVC architecture with routes and controllers, making it easier for developers to structure their applications. In contrast, Trailblazer is designed for domain-driven design (DDD) and uses operation objects for defining business logic, which can provide more flexibility and organization in complex applications.
Code Organization: Laravel encourages developers to organize their code using models, views, and controllers, following the MVC pattern. Trailblazer, on the other hand, promotes the concepts of "concepts," which are reusable and configurable building blocks for defining business logic, leading to a more modular and testable codebase.
Form Handling: Laravel provides form requests for validating user input, while Trailblazer focuses on form objects that encapsulate the logic for handling form submissions. This approach in Trailblazer helps in separating concerns and keeping the application more maintainable.
Authentication and Authorization: Laravel comes with built-in authentication and authorization features, making it easier to implement user authentication and access control. Trailblazer, on the other hand, is more focused on business logic and does not offer out-of-the-box solutions for authentication and authorization, which may require additional configuration and customization.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Laravel has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and packages available to extend its functionality. Trailblazer, being a less popular framework, may have a smaller community and limited resources, which can impact the availability of support and third-party integrations.
Learning Curve: While Laravel is known for its ease of use and beginner-friendly nature, Trailblazer has a steeper learning curve due to its unique concepts and principles. Developers familiar with traditional MVC frameworks may find it challenging to adapt to Trailblazer's domain-driven design approach.

In Summary, Laravel and Trailblazer differ in their architectural patterns, code organization, form handling, authentication mechanisms, community support, and learning curves.

Laravel vs Trailblazer

Overview