Laravel vs UIkIt

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.8K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Laravel vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Architecture: One key difference between Laravel and UIkit is that Laravel is a PHP web application framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework that focuses on providing a set of customizable and responsive UI components for web development.
Language: Laravel is written in PHP, which is a server-side scripting language, while UIkit is mainly based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for front-end development.
Usage: Laravel is primarily used for building full-fledged web applications and APIs, leveraging features like artisan command-line utility, Eloquent ORM, and Blade templating engine, whereas UIkit is commonly used for quickly prototyping, designing, and creating visually appealing user interfaces due to its comprehensive collection of ready-to-use components and utilities.
Community: Laravel has a large and active community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and packages, while UIkit also has a supportive community but may not be as vast as Laravel's community.
Learning Curve: Laravel comes with a steeper learning curve due to its full-stack capabilities, requiring understanding of PHP and MVC concepts, whereas UIkit has a relatively easier learning curve as it focuses more on front-end development and providing pre-designed components for users to utilize.
Scalability: Laravel is known for its scalability and robustness, making it suitable for handling complex applications and large projects with ease, while UIkit is more lightweight and is better suited for smaller to medium-sized projects that require quick and efficient design implementations.

In Summary, Laravel and UIkit differ in terms of architecture, language, usage, community support, learning curve, and scalability, catering to different needs and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, UIkIt

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	UIkIt
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 791
Followers 23.8K	Followers 417
Votes 3.9K	Votes 262
Pros & Cons
Pros 556 Clean architecture 393 Growing community 371 Composer friendly 345 Open source 326 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Functional 24 Easy to learn
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Laravel, UIkIt?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Laravel vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Architecture: One key difference between Laravel and UIkit is that Laravel is a PHP web application framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework that focuses on providing a set of customizable and responsive UI components for web development.
Language: Laravel is written in PHP, which is a server-side scripting language, while UIkit is mainly based on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for front-end development.
Usage: Laravel is primarily used for building full-fledged web applications and APIs, leveraging features like artisan command-line utility, Eloquent ORM, and Blade templating engine, whereas UIkit is commonly used for quickly prototyping, designing, and creating visually appealing user interfaces due to its comprehensive collection of ready-to-use components and utilities.
Community: Laravel has a large and active community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and packages, while UIkit also has a supportive community but may not be as vast as Laravel's community.
Learning Curve: Laravel comes with a steeper learning curve due to its full-stack capabilities, requiring understanding of PHP and MVC concepts, whereas UIkit has a relatively easier learning curve as it focuses more on front-end development and providing pre-designed components for users to utilize.
Scalability: Laravel is known for its scalability and robustness, making it suitable for handling complex applications and large projects with ease, while UIkit is more lightweight and is better suited for smaller to medium-sized projects that require quick and efficient design implementations.

In Summary, Laravel and UIkit differ in terms of architecture, language, usage, community support, learning curve, and scalability, catering to different needs and preferences in web development.

Laravel vs UIkIt

Overview