Lazarus vs Qt Creator

Overview

Lazarus

Stacks28

Followers41

Votes35

GitHub Stars355

Forks93

Qt Creator

Stacks115

Followers117

Votes18

Lazarus vs Qt Creator: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Lazarus and Qt Creator, highlighting the key differences between the two software development environments.

Ease of Installation and Setup: Lazarus, being an open-source project, is relatively easier to install and set up compared to Qt Creator. Lazarus comes as a single package that includes the integrated development environment (IDE) and the Free Pascal compiler, making it a straightforward process. On the other hand, Qt Creator requires the installation of the Qt framework, which adds complexity to the setup process.
Supported Programming Languages: Lazarus primarily supports the Object Pascal programming language, making it an ideal choice for developers familiar with Delphi and other Pascal-based environments. In contrast, Qt Creator supports multiple programming languages, including C++, JavaScript, and QML, providing a more versatile development platform.
Cross-Platform Development: Qt Creator is renowned for its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to create applications that can run on various operating systems with minimal modifications. Lazarus, although it supports cross-platform development, is more focused on Windows and Linux platforms and may require additional effort for full cross-platform compatibility.
Rich GUI Development Tools: Qt Creator offers a comprehensive set of tools and widgets for creating rich graphical user interfaces (GUIs). The Qt framework provides a wide range of pre-built widgets and a powerful declarative language called QML, simplifying GUI development. Lazarus also offers GUI development capabilities but may not have the same level of richness and flexibility as Qt Creator.
Integration with Native Technologies: Qt Creator excels in integrating with native technologies and platform-specific features. It provides extensive support for platform-specific APIs, enabling developers to leverage device capabilities and access system resources effortlessly. Lazarus, while offering platform-specific features, may not have the same level of integration as Qt Creator.
Community and Support: Both Lazarus and Qt Creator have active communities and provide support to developers. However, Qt Creator benefits from being part of the larger Qt ecosystem, with a vast community and abundant resources available. Lazarus also has an active community, but the availability of resources and the size of the community may be relatively smaller compared to Qt Creator.

In Summary, Lazarus and Qt Creator differ in terms of ease of installation and setup, supported programming languages, cross-platform development focus, GUI development tools, integration with native technologies, and the size of their communities and availability of resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lazarus	Qt Creator
It is a Delphi compatible cross-platform IDE for Rapid Application Development. It has variety of components ready for use and a graphical form designer to easily create complex graphical user interfaces.	It is a cross platform integrated development environment (IDE) to create C++ and QML applications for multiple desktop, embedded and mobile platforms. It comes with a code editor, and is integrated with tools for designing, coding, testing, deploying and maintaining your software throughout its product lifecycle.
Cross Platform IDE. Work on your favourite system; Platform independent projects out of the box. Simply copy your project to another platform and compile it; Build native binaries. Distribute your binaries without dependencies on any runtime environment; Several database frameworks to meet your requirements; Reporting and Charting; A choice of Networking libraries available	syntax highlighting; autocompletion
Statistics
GitHub Stars 355	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 93	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 28	Stacks 115
Followers 41	Followers 117
Votes 35	Votes 18
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Support for Multi-Platform-Compiling 3 Performance 3 GUI Designer 2 Opensource 2 Visual GUI Designer Cons 3 You don't end with a totally broken financial situation	Pros 5 User friendly 2 Code intellisense for qml 2 Free and opensource 1 Light and Fast 1 Visual Editor
Integrations
Linux macOS iOS Windows Android OS	JavaScript C++

What are some alternatives to Lazarus, Qt Creator?

PhpStorm

PhpStorm is a PHP IDE which keeps up with latest PHP & web languages trends, integrates a variety of modern tools, and brings even more extensibility with support for major PHP frameworks.

IntelliJ IDEA

Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages.

Visual Studio

Visual Studio is a suite of component-based software development tools and other technologies for building powerful, high-performance applications.

WebStorm

WebStorm is a lightweight and intelligent IDE for front-end development and server-side JavaScript.

NetBeans IDE

NetBeans IDE is FREE, open source, and has a worldwide community of users and developers.

PyCharm

PyCharm’s smart code editor provides first-class support for Python, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, TypeScript, CSS, popular template languages and more. Take advantage of language-aware code completion, error detection, and on-the-fly code fixes!

Eclipse

Standard Eclipse package suited for Java and plug-in development plus adding new plugins; already includes Git, Marketplace Client, source code and developer documentation. Click here to file a bug against Eclipse Platform.

Android Studio

Android Studio is a new Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA. It provides new features and improvements over Eclipse ADT and will be the official Android IDE once it's ready.

RubyMine

JetBrains RubyMine IDE provides a comprehensive Ruby code editor aware of dynamic language specifics and delivers smart coding assistance, intelligent code refactoring and code analysis capabilities.

CLion

Knowing your code through and through, CLion can take care of the routine while you focus on the important things. Boost your productivity with the keyboard-centric approach (Vim-emulation plugin is also available in plugin repository), full coding assistance, smart and relevant code completion, fast project navigation, intelligent intention actions, and reliable refactorings.

Related Comparisons

Lazarus vs Qt Creator: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Lazarus and Qt Creator, highlighting the key differences between the two software development environments.

Ease of Installation and Setup: Lazarus, being an open-source project, is relatively easier to install and set up compared to Qt Creator. Lazarus comes as a single package that includes the integrated development environment (IDE) and the Free Pascal compiler, making it a straightforward process. On the other hand, Qt Creator requires the installation of the Qt framework, which adds complexity to the setup process.
Supported Programming Languages: Lazarus primarily supports the Object Pascal programming language, making it an ideal choice for developers familiar with Delphi and other Pascal-based environments. In contrast, Qt Creator supports multiple programming languages, including C++, JavaScript, and QML, providing a more versatile development platform.
Cross-Platform Development: Qt Creator is renowned for its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to create applications that can run on various operating systems with minimal modifications. Lazarus, although it supports cross-platform development, is more focused on Windows and Linux platforms and may require additional effort for full cross-platform compatibility.
Rich GUI Development Tools: Qt Creator offers a comprehensive set of tools and widgets for creating rich graphical user interfaces (GUIs). The Qt framework provides a wide range of pre-built widgets and a powerful declarative language called QML, simplifying GUI development. Lazarus also offers GUI development capabilities but may not have the same level of richness and flexibility as Qt Creator.
Integration with Native Technologies: Qt Creator excels in integrating with native technologies and platform-specific features. It provides extensive support for platform-specific APIs, enabling developers to leverage device capabilities and access system resources effortlessly. Lazarus, while offering platform-specific features, may not have the same level of integration as Qt Creator.
Community and Support: Both Lazarus and Qt Creator have active communities and provide support to developers. However, Qt Creator benefits from being part of the larger Qt ecosystem, with a vast community and abundant resources available. Lazarus also has an active community, but the availability of resources and the size of the community may be relatively smaller compared to Qt Creator.

Lazarus vs Qt Creator

Overview