StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Cloud Hosting
  5. Linode vs PythonAnywhere

Linode vs PythonAnywhere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Linode
Linode
Stacks782
Followers623
Votes422
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64

Linode vs PythonAnywhere: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In today's digital era, it is crucial to carefully choose the right hosting service for your website or web application. Linode and PythonAnywhere are two popular hosting providers that offer different features and advantages. It's important to understand the key differences between Linode and PythonAnywhere to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and requirements.

1. Scalability:

Linode offers scalable cloud computing solutions, allowing users to easily scale their applications as their requirements change. This means that you can easily increase or decrease the resources allocated to your Linode instance, such as CPU, RAM, storage, and network bandwidth, according to the changing demands of your website or application. On the other hand, PythonAnywhere has a more limited scalability as it primarily focuses on hosting Python web applications and does not provide the same level of scalability options as Linode.

2. Server Management:

With Linode, you have full control and access to the underlying server infrastructure. This means you have the freedom to configure and manage your server as you wish, including the ability to install and customize software, set up security protocols, and optimize performance. On the contrary, with PythonAnywhere, most of the server management aspects are abstracted away from the user. PythonAnywhere offers a simplified hosting environment, where most of the server configuration and management is taken care of by the platform, allowing users to focus more on their Python applications rather than server administration tasks.

3. Pricing and Cost:

Linode operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the resources you use. This flexibility makes it suitable for users who have varying resource needs over time or want more control over their hosting costs. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, offers fixed pricing plans for different levels of resource allocation. While this fixed pricing structure may be beneficial for users with consistent resource requirements, it may not be as cost-effective for those who experience fluctuations in traffic or resource usage.

4. Supported Technologies:

Linode is known for its wide range of supported technologies and operating systems. It provides users with a selection of Linux distributions, including CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, and more. Additionally, Linode supports various programming languages, frameworks, and databases, making it a versatile choice for developers. PythonAnywhere, as the name suggests, primarily focuses on hosting Python web applications. While it does provide support for Python-related technologies and frameworks, the range of supported technologies is more limited compared to Linode.

5. Customizability and Flexibility:

Being a cloud infrastructure provider, Linode offers high levels of customizability and flexibility to meet individual requirements. Users can choose different server configurations, disk images, networking options, and control panel setups to tailor their hosting environment as per their specific needs. PythonAnywhere, as a managed hosting platform, provides a more standardized and pre-configured environment. Although this reduces the complexity of server setup and maintenance, it limits the ability to customize the hosting environment beyond the provided options.

6. Development and Testing Environment:

Linode is often favored by developers and system administrators due to its ability to serve as a robust development and testing environment. It allows users to replicate their production environment on a Linode instance, facilitating the development and testing of applications in a controlled setting. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, is geared more towards hosting and deploying Python-based web applications. While it does provide some development functionality, its main focus is on simplifying the deployment and hosting processes.

In Summary, Linode provides scalable cloud computing solutions with full server management control, wider technology support, and greater customizability, while PythonAnywhere offers a simplified hosting environment, fixed pricing plans, and specific focus on hosting Python web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Linode
Linode
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Deploy multiple Linux distributions;Create Configuration Profiles which associate disk images and device nodes;Boot between configuration profiles;Share disk images between configuration profiles;Resize disk images;Network and CPU usage graphs;Multiple IP address support;Managed/hosted DNS service with slave support;Custom reverse DNS (rdns);Access Out of band console access using Lish;Lish menu system to issue jobs to your Linode;Lish access via SSH keys;Support for booting into single user mode, init=/bin/bash;Support for booting with a custom "root=" kernel parameter;Support for booting with an initrd;Bootable recovery distribution (Finnix);Add and remove extra resources to and from your Linode;Shutdown Watchdog will automatically reboot your Linode in case of a crash;Clone a Linode to another;Move IPs from one Linode to another;IP address fail over support for high availability setups
-
Statistics
Stacks
782
Stacks
90
Followers
623
Followers
293
Votes
422
Votes
64
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Extremely reliable
  • 70
    Good value
  • 60
    Great customer support
  • 58
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Great documentation
Cons
  • 2
    No "floating IP" support
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Shell access
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Great support
Cons
  • 1
    Really small community
  • 1
    No root access
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Linode, PythonAnywhere?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Amazon EC2

Amazon EC2

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Scaleway

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase