StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Liquid vs Slim Lang

Liquid vs Slim Lang

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Liquid
Liquid
Stacks261
Followers126
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.5K
Forks1.5K
Slim Lang
Slim Lang
Stacks65
Followers57
Votes50
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks499

Liquid vs Slim Lang: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Liquid and Slim Lang are two popular templating languages used in web development. Despite having similarities in terms of syntax and functionality, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other. Below are some of the main disparities between Liquid and Slim Lang.

# 1. Syntax: Liquid uses a more verbose syntax compared to Slim Lang. Liquid uses double curly braces {{ }} to denote variables, while Slim Lang aims for minimalism by using indentation instead of tags.

# 2. Whitespace Handling: In Liquid, whitespace matters and can affect the rendering of the template, whereas Slim Lang ignores whitespace to improve readability and reduce the template's visual clutter.

# 3. Extensibility: Liquid offers more built-in features and filters for manipulating data and content within the template, while Slim Lang focuses on simplicity and minimalism, often requiring additional plugins for extended functionality.

# 4. Error Handling: Liquid provides more detailed error messages and debugging options, making it easier to troubleshoot issues within the template, while Slim Lang may sometimes produce more cryptic errors due to its minimalist syntax.

# 5. Community Support: Liquid has a larger and more established community with a wealth of resources and documentation available, whereas Slim Lang, being more niche, may have fewer resources and plugins developed by the community.

# 6. Learning Curve: Due to its simplistic and minimalistic nature, Slim Lang may have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Liquid, which offers a more intuitive and feature-rich environment for template development.

In Summary, Liquid and Slim Lang differ in syntax, whitespace handling, extensibility, error handling, community support, and learning curve, making each suitable for different use cases and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Liquid, Slim Lang

Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Liquid
Liquid
Slim Lang
Slim Lang

It is an open-source template language written in Ruby. It is the backbone of Shopify themes and is used to load dynamic content on storefronts. It is safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

Render templates directly from the database;Smarty (PHP) style template engines;Template engine which does HTML just as well as emails;Allow your users to edit the appearance of your application but don't want them to run insecure code on your server
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.5K
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
499
Stacks
261
Stacks
65
Followers
126
Followers
57
Votes
0
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    Easier to type and maintain than haml
  • 12
    Very clean and logical
  • 9
    Integrates with Rails by installing a single gem
  • 8
    Performs better than haml
  • 4
    Concise
Cons
  • 2
    Not so good editor support
  • 1
    Easy to break nesting when reindenting or copy-pasting
  • 1
    Overcomplicated syntax
  • 1
    Lots of syntactic corner cases
Integrations
VTEX
VTEX
Zendesk
Zendesk
Voog
Voog
Drip
Drip
Ruby
Ruby
Jekyll
Jekyll
Fedora
Fedora
Locomotive CMS
Locomotive CMS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Liquid, Slim Lang?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase