StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Mailcoach vs listmonk

Mailcoach vs listmonk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

listmonk
listmonk
Stacks9
Followers34
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.1K
Forks1.8K
Mailcoach
Mailcoach
Stacks6
Followers15
Votes0

Mailcoach vs listmonk: What are the differences?

Mailcoach vs listmonk: Key Differences

  1. User Interface: Mailcoach provides a more user-friendly and visually appealing interface, making it easier for users to navigate and use various features. In contrast, listmonk sticks to a simpler, less flashy interface but focuses more on functionality and customization options.

  2. Deployment Options: Mailcoach offers a hosted version for users who prefer a hassle-free setup, while also providing a self-hosted version for those who want more control and flexibility over their email marketing platform. On the other hand, listmonk primarily focuses on self-hosted deployment with limited support for cloud hosting solutions.

  3. Automation Capabilities: Mailcoach excels in automation features with a visual automation builder that allows users to create complex email sequences without coding knowledge. In comparison, listmonk offers basic automation functionalities and may require additional integration with third-party tools for more advanced automation needs.

  4. Customization and Branding: Mailcoach provides extensive customization options, allowing users to brand their email campaigns with custom templates, logos, and colors. Listmonk, on the other hand, has limited branding options and may require more manual customization efforts for a branded look and feel.

  5. Integration Ecosystem: Mailcoach has a robust integration ecosystem with popular third-party tools and services, making it easier for users to connect their email marketing efforts with other platforms. Listmonk, while having some integrations available, may require more manual configuration and development work for seamless integrations.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Mailcoach benefits from a strong community support system, with active forums, documentation, and tutorials available for users seeking help or guidance. Listmonk, while having some community resources, may not offer the same level of comprehensive support and resources as Mailcoach.

In Summary, Mailcoach offers a user-friendly interface, deployment flexibility, advanced automation features, extensive customization options, a robust integration ecosystem, and strong community support, whereas listmonk focuses more on simplicity, self-hosted deployment, basic automation capabilities, limited branding options, manual integration efforts, and may lack comprehensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

listmonk
listmonk
Mailcoach
Mailcoach

It is a standalone, self-hosted, newsletter and mailing list manager. It is fast, feature-rich, and packed into a single binary. It uses a PostgreSQL database as its data store.

It is a self-hosted email list manager. It integrates with services like Amazon SES, Mailgun or Sendgrid to send out mailings affordably. Stand-alone, or integrated in a Laravel project, it's perfect for bloggers, artisans and entrepreneurs.

self-hosted; newsletter manager; mailing list manager
Unlimited subscribers; Email list managment; Campaigns; Templates; Tracking; Email list for Laravel; Buy once (a year)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
9
Stacks
6
Followers
34
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun
Mailgun
Amazon SES
Amazon SES
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to listmonk, Mailcoach?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase