Lit vs Quasar Framework

Overview

Lit

Stacks126

Followers36

Votes4

GitHub Stars2.0K

Forks94

Quasar Framework

Stacks451

Followers771

Votes404

GitHub Stars26.9K

Forks3.7K

Lit vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

Developers describe Lit as "441 byte responsive 🔥 CSS framework". A tiny CSS framework that preserves everything Skeleton, Milligram, and other micro frameworks have to offer. On the other hand, Quasar Framework is detailed as "Full front-end framework powered by Vue". Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Lit and Quasar Framework can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Lit and Quasar Framework are both open source tools. Quasar Framework with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.12K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Lit with 1.15K GitHub stars and 64 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lit	Quasar Framework
A tiny CSS framework that preserves everything Skeleton, Milligram, and other micro frameworks have to offer.	Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.
-	SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.0K	GitHub Stars 26.9K
GitHub Forks 94	GitHub Forks 3.7K
Stacks 126	Stacks 451
Followers 36	Followers 771
Votes 4	Votes 404
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Lit-html 2 Performance	Pros 59 Excellent documentation 44 Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more 40 Lots of UI components 39 Extensive collection of components 33 Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome Cons 4 Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux Electron macOS Windows Vue.js Material Design

What are some alternatives to Lit, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Lit vs Quasar Framework