LiveReload vs nodemon

Overview

LiveReload

Stacks653

Followers70

Votes8

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks164

nodemon

Stacks3.3K

Followers195

Votes2

GitHub Stars26.7K

Forks1.7K

LiveReload vs nodemon: What are the differences?

Installation: LiveReload requires a browser extension or script to be installed to work, while nodemon is solely a command line tool that can be easily installed through npm.
Functionality: LiveReload automatically refreshes the browser when changes are made to files, while nodemon restarts the server when changes are detected in the codebase.
Compatibility: LiveReload is primarily used for front-end development to reload CSS, JS, and images, whereas nodemon is used for back-end development to restart the server on file changes.
Use Cases: LiveReload is more suited for designers and front-end developers who focus on the visual aspect of the website, while nodemon is tailored for server-side developers who work on the logic and functionality of the application.
Dependencies: LiveReload depends on having a specific browser extension, which might not be available for all browsers, while nodemon has minimal dependencies and works consistently across different platforms and environments.

In Summary, LiveReload and nodemon differ in their installation, functionality, compatibility, use cases, and dependencies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LiveReload	nodemon
LiveReload monitors changes in the file system. As soon as you save a file, it is preprocessed as needed, and the browser is refreshed.	It is an open source utility that will monitor for any changes in your source and automatically restart your server. It has a default support for node & coffeescript, but easy to run any executable (such as python, make, etc).
-	Automatic restarting of application; Detects default file extension to monitor
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.4K	GitHub Stars 26.7K
GitHub Forks 164	GitHub Forks 1.7K
Stacks 653	Stacks 3.3K
Followers 70	Followers 195
Votes 8	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Lightweight, Gulp support 2 Reliable 1 More stable on windows 1 Stable in Chrome	Pros 1 Easy to use 1 It's lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available	ExpressJS TypeScript Node.js

What are some alternatives to LiveReload, nodemon?

CodeKit

Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.

Prepros

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Nodetime

Nodetime is an application performance management toolset in the cloud - an all-round solution for performance monitoring, optimization and troubleshooting.

BrowserSync

BrowserSync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions across multiple devices. It’s wicked-fast and totally free.

nodejs-dashboard

Determine in realtime what's happening inside your node process from the terminal. No need to instrument code to get the deets. Also splits stderr/stdout to help spot errors sooner.

NodeFly

NodeFly APM provides real-time monitoring for your Node.js application. Simplicity is the key! We allow our users to gain detailed, real-time performance monitoring of your Node.js application services so they can see everything that is happening, as it happens. This includes understanding system usage at every moment in time to uncover and resolve issues within the application as they arise.

Related Comparisons

LiveReload vs nodemon: What are the differences?

Installation: LiveReload requires a browser extension or script to be installed to work, while nodemon is solely a command line tool that can be easily installed through npm.
Functionality: LiveReload automatically refreshes the browser when changes are made to files, while nodemon restarts the server when changes are detected in the codebase.
Compatibility: LiveReload is primarily used for front-end development to reload CSS, JS, and images, whereas nodemon is used for back-end development to restart the server on file changes.
Use Cases: LiveReload is more suited for designers and front-end developers who focus on the visual aspect of the website, while nodemon is tailored for server-side developers who work on the logic and functionality of the application.
Dependencies: LiveReload depends on having a specific browser extension, which might not be available for all browsers, while nodemon has minimal dependencies and works consistently across different platforms and environments.

In Summary, LiveReload and nodemon differ in their installation, functionality, compatibility, use cases, and dependencies.

LiveReload vs nodemon

Overview