Lua vs Spring-Boot

Overview

Lua

Stacks2.5K

Followers1.0K

Votes180

GitHub Stars1.5K

Forks452

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Lua vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between Lua and Spring-Boot, highlighting their key differences. Lua is a lightweight, high-level scripting language often used as an embedded language in applications. On the other hand, Spring-Boot is a framework for building Java-based web applications, providing a platform for developing robust and scalable applications.

Language Type: Lua is a dynamically typed scripting language with a simple syntax, offering flexibility and ease of use. In contrast, Spring-Boot is built on Java, a statically typed language, which provides strong type checking and advanced object-oriented programming features.
Purpose: Lua is commonly used for extending the functionality of existing applications or as a standalone scripting language, focusing on simplicity and efficiency. Spring-Boot, on the other hand, is specifically designed for building web applications, emphasizing modularity, scalability, and enterprise-level functionality.
Community Support: Lua has a smaller community compared to Spring-Boot, which has a large and active community. This means that Spring-Boot offers extensive resources, documentation, tutorials, and community support, making it easier for developers to find solutions and get help when needed.
Performance: Lua is known for its lightweight nature and high performance, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. Spring-Boot, being built on Java, benefits from the performance optimizations and runtime efficiency provided by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), enabling it to handle large and complex applications efficiently.
Integration with other Technologies: Spring-Boot provides extensive integration capabilities with various Java-based frameworks and libraries, allowing developers to leverage existing tools and technologies effectively. In comparison, while Lua supports calling C functions, it may require additional manual integration efforts for seamless integration with existing frameworks and libraries.
Ecosystem and Available Libraries: Spring-Boot benefits from the vast Java ecosystem, with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools available for developers. This extensive ecosystem allows for rapid development and easy integration of various functionalities. Lua, while having a growing ecosystem, may have fewer libraries and frameworks available, potentially requiring more effort for specific functionalities.

In summary, Lua is a lightweight, flexible scripting language with a simple syntax and good performance, often used for embedding in applications. Spring-Boot, built on Java, is specifically designed for building web applications, providing a more extensive ecosystem, community support, and integration capabilities with various technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lua, Spring Boot

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

Django

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lua	Spring Boot
Lua combines simple procedural syntax with powerful data description constructs based on associative arrays and extensible semantics. Lua is dynamically typed, runs by interpreting bytecode for a register-based virtual machine, and has automatic memory management with incremental garbage collection, making it ideal for configuration, scripting, and rapid prototyping.	Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.5K	GitHub Stars 78.9K
GitHub Forks 452	GitHub Forks 41.6K
Stacks 2.5K	Stacks 26.7K
Followers 1.0K	Followers 24.3K
Votes 180	Votes 1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros 41 Fast learning curve 26 Very easy to embed in C programs 26 Efficient memory usage 20 Open source 19 Good for game scripting Cons 4 Nooby 2 Not widespread 1 D 0 Python	Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive
Integrations
No integrations available	Spring Java

What are some alternatives to Lua, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Related Comparisons

Lua vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

Language Type: Lua is a dynamically typed scripting language with a simple syntax, offering flexibility and ease of use. In contrast, Spring-Boot is built on Java, a statically typed language, which provides strong type checking and advanced object-oriented programming features.
Purpose: Lua is commonly used for extending the functionality of existing applications or as a standalone scripting language, focusing on simplicity and efficiency. Spring-Boot, on the other hand, is specifically designed for building web applications, emphasizing modularity, scalability, and enterprise-level functionality.
Community Support: Lua has a smaller community compared to Spring-Boot, which has a large and active community. This means that Spring-Boot offers extensive resources, documentation, tutorials, and community support, making it easier for developers to find solutions and get help when needed.
Performance: Lua is known for its lightweight nature and high performance, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments. Spring-Boot, being built on Java, benefits from the performance optimizations and runtime efficiency provided by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), enabling it to handle large and complex applications efficiently.
Integration with other Technologies: Spring-Boot provides extensive integration capabilities with various Java-based frameworks and libraries, allowing developers to leverage existing tools and technologies effectively. In comparison, while Lua supports calling C functions, it may require additional manual integration efforts for seamless integration with existing frameworks and libraries.
Ecosystem and Available Libraries: Spring-Boot benefits from the vast Java ecosystem, with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools available for developers. This extensive ecosystem allows for rapid development and easy integration of various functionalities. Lua, while having a growing ecosystem, may have fewer libraries and frameworks available, potentially requiring more effort for specific functionalities.

Lua vs Spring-Boot

Overview