Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MapStruct vs Quarkus: What are the differences?
Introduction:
MapStruct and Quarkus are both popular frameworks used in Java development. While MapStruct is a code generation library for mapping Java bean types, Quarkus is a full-stack framework designed for building lightweight and fast Java applications. Despite their differences, both frameworks offer unique features and advantages for developers.
1. MapStruct: Simple and Type-Safe Bean Mapping
MapStruct focuses on simplifying and automating the process of mapping Java bean types. It generates mapping code during the compilation process and provides type-safety, reducing the risk of runtime errors. The generated code is optimized and does not require the involvement of runtime reflection.
2. Quarkus: Lightweight and Fast Application Development
Quarkus takes a different approach by offering a full-stack framework for developing Java applications. It is specifically designed for building lightweight, container-based applications with fast startup times and low memory consumption. Quarkus leverages features like ahead-of-time compilation and native image generation to achieve these performance benefits.
3. MapStruct: No Runtime Dependencies
One key difference between MapStruct and Quarkus is the dependency management approach. MapStruct does not introduce any additional runtime dependencies to your project. Instead, it generates mapping code that is purely based on the existing Java classes. This can be beneficial for projects with strict dependency requirements or when minimizing the project's overall footprint is a priority.
4. Quarkus: Cloud-Native Architecture and Containerization
Quarkus is designed with cloud-native architecture and containerization in mind. It provides extensive support for building microservices and deploying applications on cloud platforms like Kubernetes. Quarkus offers features like reactive programming, scalable event-driven architectures, and simplified deployment and scaling options in cloud environments.
5. MapStruct: Supports Mapping Annotations and Custom Mappings
MapStruct offers support for mapping annotations, allowing developers to customize the mapping process further. By using custom annotations, developers can define specific mapping rules, handle special cases, and apply transformations on a per-field basis. MapStruct also allows the creation of custom mapping methods, providing flexibility in mapping complex or non-standard mappings.
6. Quarkus: Native Image Compilation and GraalVM Support
One of the prominent features of Quarkus is its native image compilation support. Quarkus applications can be compiled into native executables using tools like GraalVM, resulting in reduced startup times, lower memory consumption, and improved overall performance. This native image approach is particularly useful for microservices and serverless architectures, where rapid scaling and fast startup times are critical.
In Summary, MapStruct focuses on simplifying and automating bean mapping with no runtime dependencies, while Quarkus provides a lightweight, performance-optimized framework for fast application development, cloud-native architecture, and native image compilation support.
Pros of MapStruct
- Abstraction of the object conversion1
Pros of Quarkus
- Fast startup13
- Open source13
- Low memory footprint11
- Integrated with GraalVM10
- Produce native code10
- Hot Reload9
- AOT compilation7
- Reactive6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MapStruct
Cons of Quarkus
- Boilerplate code when using Reflection2