StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Material Components Web vs Mobiscroll

Material Components Web vs Mobiscroll

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mobiscroll
Mobiscroll
Stacks8
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks436
Material Components Web
Material Components Web
Stacks12
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars17.1K
Forks2.1K

Material Components Web vs Mobiscroll: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing between Material Components Web and Mobiscroll for web development, understanding the key differences between the two can help in making an informed decision.

  1. Design Language: Material Components Web adheres strictly to Google's Material Design guidelines, providing a modern and sleek look with predefined elements and typography, while Mobiscroll focuses on providing enhanced mobile-friendly UI components suited for touch interaction and user experience.

  2. Feature Set: Material Components Web offers a comprehensive set of UI components, including buttons, cards, dialogs, menus, and more, following Material Design principles. On the other hand, Mobiscroll provides specialized components like date pickers, time pickers, event calendars, and customizable forms for mobile interfaces.

  3. Customization Options: Material Components Web offers some level of customization within the Material Design framework, providing predefined themes and styles to maintain consistency across apps. In contrast, Mobiscroll offers extensive customization options, including themes, colors, and styling, allowing developers to tailor the UI components to match the specific brand or design requirements.

  4. Compatibility and Integration: Material Components Web seamlessly integrates with other Google tools and frameworks, such as Angular, React, and Vue, enhancing development productivity within the Google ecosystem. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, offers cross-platform compatibility and integration with popular frameworks like jQuery, Angular, and React, providing versatility in development environments.

  5. Documentation and Support: Material Components Web is well-supported by Google's documentation, community forums, and developer resources, offering detailed guidelines and best practices for implementation. Mobiscroll also provides comprehensive documentation, guides, and customer support, ensuring developers have the necessary resources to effectively use their UI components.

  6. License and Cost: Material Components Web is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective choice for projects with budget constraints or open-source initiatives. In comparison, while Mobiscroll offers a free trial, the full-featured version requires purchasing a license, which may be suitable for commercial projects or applications requiring advanced features and support.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Material Components Web and Mobiscroll in terms of design language, feature set, customization options, compatibility, documentation and support, as well as licensing and cost can assist developers in selecting the most suitable UI component framework for their web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mobiscroll
Mobiscroll
Material Components Web
Material Components Web

It is a UI library for progressive web-apps and hybrid development. Created with a lot of attention to usability and performance.

It helps developers execute Material Design. Developed by a core team of engineers and UX designers at Google, these components enable a reliable development workflow to build beautiful and functional web projects.

Calendar; Text input fields; Responsive grid layout; Page styling and typography; Segmented control; Progress indicator
Modular; Customizable; Material Design UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
17.1K
GitHub Forks
436
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
8
Stacks
12
Followers
22
Followers
23
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Greenhouse
Greenhouse
Atatus
Atatus
Backand
Backand
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
StackBlitz
StackBlitz
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Mobiscroll, Material Components Web?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase