StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. UI Components
  5. Material Components Web vs Xen Orchestra

Material Components Web vs Xen Orchestra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Xen Orchestra
Xen Orchestra
Stacks13
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars901
Forks291
Material Components Web
Material Components Web
Stacks12
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars17.1K
Forks2.1K

Material Components Web vs Xen Orchestra: What are the differences?

Developers describe Material Components Web as "Build beautiful, usable products using Material Components for the web". It helps developers execute Material Design. Developed by a core team of engineers and UX designers at Google, these components enable a reliable development workflow to build beautiful and functional web projects. On the other hand, Xen Orchestra is detailed as "The Web Interface for XenServer". It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

Material Components Web and Xen Orchestra belong to "UI Components" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Material Components Web are:

  • Modular
  • Customizable
  • Material Design UI components

On the other hand, Xen Orchestra provides the following key features:

  • Xen management
  • Easy-to-use
  • Fast

Xen Orchestra is an open source tool with 309 GitHub stars and 124 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Xen Orchestra's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Xen Orchestra
Xen Orchestra
Material Components Web
Material Components Web

It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

It helps developers execute Material Design. Developed by a core team of engineers and UX designers at Google, these components enable a reliable development workflow to build beautiful and functional web projects.

Xen management; Easy-to-use; Fast; Easy migration
Modular; Customizable; Material Design UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars
901
GitHub Stars
17.1K
GitHub Forks
291
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
13
Stacks
12
Followers
19
Followers
23
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Packer
Packer
CloudConvert
CloudConvert
ScaleGrid
ScaleGrid
RunAbove
RunAbove
Neptune.io
Neptune.io
Morpheus
Morpheus
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Xen Orchestra, Material Components Web?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

uWSGI

uWSGI

The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase