StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design Lite vs Materialize

Material Design Lite vs Materialize

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite
Stacks697
Followers394
Votes62
GitHub Stars32.2K
Forks5.0K

Material Design Lite vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Material Design Lite (MDL) and Materialize are both front-end frameworks based on Google's Material Design principles. While they share similarities, they also have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Design Philosophy: Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight version of Material Design that focuses on simplicity and performance. It provides a set of CSS, JavaScript, and HTML templates that can be easily incorporated into any project. On the other hand, Materialize is a full-fledged front-end framework that offers a wide range of pre-designed components, animations, and customization options.

  2. Component Library: MDL offers a limited set of components, primarily focusing on the essential elements needed for building a website. It includes buttons, cards, menus, tabs, etc. Materialize, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive library of ready-to-use components, such as navigation bars, modals, sliders, date pickers, and more. This makes Materialize a better choice for projects that require a rich variety of pre-built components.

  3. Accessibility: MDL puts a strong emphasis on accessibility, aiming to provide a good user experience for all users regardless of their abilities. It includes built-in accessibility features and follows W3C accessibility guidelines. Materialize also considers accessibility but may require additional manual adjustments to ensure full compliance.

  4. Customization and Theming: Material Design Lite allows for easy customization by providing SASS variables, allowing developers to modify colors, spacing, and typography. However, the customization options are relatively limited compared to Materialize. Materialize provides a robust theming system, allowing developers to customize almost every aspect of the design, including colors, typography, shadows, and more.

  5. File Size and Load Time: Due to its lightweight nature, MDL has a smaller file size and faster load times compared to Materialize. This makes it a good choice for projects where speed and performance are crucial. Materialize, on the other hand, has a larger file size due to its extensive component library and customization options, which can result in longer load times.

  6. Learning Curve: MDL is relatively easy to learn and use, as it focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It provides straightforward documentation and examples to get started quickly. Materialize, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more extensive feature set and customization options. It requires a deeper understanding of the framework to utilize its full potential.

In Summary, Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight and minimalist front-end framework with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering a limited set of components. Materialize, on the other hand, is a full-fledged framework with a comprehensive component library, extensive customization options, and a slightly steeper learning curve. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements and the level of customization needed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Blog template;Dashboard template;Text heavy webpage template; Stand alone article template;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
32.2K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
698
Stacks
697
Followers
1.2K
Followers
394
Votes
557
Votes
62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Pros
  • 23
    Material Design straight from the original creators
  • 11
    Based on bem philosophy
  • 9
    Nice animations
  • 7
    SCSS
  • 5
    Simple Material Design

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Material Design Lite?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase