Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design Lite vs Materialize: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Material Design Lite (MDL) and Materialize are both front-end frameworks based on Google's Material Design principles. While they share similarities, they also have some key differences that set them apart.
Design Philosophy: Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight version of Material Design that focuses on simplicity and performance. It provides a set of CSS, JavaScript, and HTML templates that can be easily incorporated into any project. On the other hand, Materialize is a full-fledged front-end framework that offers a wide range of pre-designed components, animations, and customization options.
Component Library: MDL offers a limited set of components, primarily focusing on the essential elements needed for building a website. It includes buttons, cards, menus, tabs, etc. Materialize, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive library of ready-to-use components, such as navigation bars, modals, sliders, date pickers, and more. This makes Materialize a better choice for projects that require a rich variety of pre-built components.
Accessibility: MDL puts a strong emphasis on accessibility, aiming to provide a good user experience for all users regardless of their abilities. It includes built-in accessibility features and follows W3C accessibility guidelines. Materialize also considers accessibility but may require additional manual adjustments to ensure full compliance.
Customization and Theming: Material Design Lite allows for easy customization by providing SASS variables, allowing developers to modify colors, spacing, and typography. However, the customization options are relatively limited compared to Materialize. Materialize provides a robust theming system, allowing developers to customize almost every aspect of the design, including colors, typography, shadows, and more.
File Size and Load Time: Due to its lightweight nature, MDL has a smaller file size and faster load times compared to Materialize. This makes it a good choice for projects where speed and performance are crucial. Materialize, on the other hand, has a larger file size due to its extensive component library and customization options, which can result in longer load times.
Learning Curve: MDL is relatively easy to learn and use, as it focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It provides straightforward documentation and examples to get started quickly. Materialize, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more extensive feature set and customization options. It requires a deeper understanding of the framework to utilize its full potential.
In Summary, Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight and minimalist front-end framework with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering a limited set of components. Materialize, on the other hand, is a full-fledged framework with a comprehensive component library, extensive customization options, and a slightly steeper learning curve. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements and the level of customization needed.
Pros of Material Design Lite
- Material Design straight from the original creators23
- Based on bem philosophy11
- Nice animations9
- SCSS7
- Simple Material Design5
- Doesn't depend on JavaScript5
- Custom color palette generates CDN2
Pros of Materialize
- Google material design102
- Easy to use74
- Responsive74
- Modern looks54
- Open source48
- Good documentation42
- Code examples37
- Extremely light - 29kb29
- Flexible28
- Great Support15
- It looks beautiful10
- Very nice looking components to quickly build out8
- Smooth animation7
- Great Grid System6
- Great4
- Ruby gem to integrate in 2 seconds flat4
- Angular2 Support3
- MIT Lisence2
- Friendly api, easy setup, good documentation2
- Easy setup2
- React1
- Grid system1
- Because of the easy to use and very editable library1
- Responsivness1
- Jibberish1
- Friendly Api1
- Better class name0
- Rtl support0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design Lite
Cons of Materialize
- Mobile errors7
- Poor Grid System6
- Unmaintained2