Material Design Lite vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?
Material Design Lite can be classified as a tool in the "Front-End Frameworks" category, while Spring Boot is grouped under "Frameworks (Full Stack)".
"Material Design straight from the original creators" is the top reason why over 23 developers like Material Design Lite, while over 78 developers mention "Powerful and handy" as the leading cause for choosing Spring Boot.
Material Design Lite and Spring Boot are both open source tools. It seems that Spring Boot with 39.8K GitHub stars and 25.8K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Material Design Lite with 31.3K GitHub stars and 5.31K GitHub forks.
MIT, Intuit, and OpenGov are some of the popular companies that use Spring Boot, whereas Material Design Lite is used by Google, Troopers, and Boxme. Spring Boot has a broader approval, being mentioned in 333 company stacks & 616 developers stacks; compared to Material Design Lite, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 26 developer stacks.
What is Material Design Lite?
What is Spring Boot?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Material Design Lite?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Material Design Lite?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
I use Spring-Boot because it almost let you get things done quickly for a JVM-target project, with auto configuration components and dependency management starters. It is almost perfectly tailored for microservices applications development with a single unit deployment artifact (JAR) along with support for Service Registry and Discovery, Circuit Breaker pattern...
Any third-party library or any back-end service would perfectly integrate well since Spring offers integration support for most of mainstream services, let it be a RDBMS service, a NoSQL database, a Message Broker...
Coming to day-to-day development, Spring-Boot enjoys a great community so you can get support, direction, focused guidance from almost everywhere.
We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.
To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas
To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS
#Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless
spring boot allow my team to start building web services quickly and package it in a stand alone application
많은 버그가 존재하는데, 각각의 css 정의가 서로 연결되어서 수정이 쉽지 않다.
발견된 이슈조차 업데이트 하지 않으며, 사용자가 직접 수정해서 사용해야한다.
Spring-Boot allows us to create stand-alone web servers and helps us configure many of our dependencies with sane default, while maintaining flexibility where we need it.