Material UI vs Mozilla Brick

Overview

Mozilla Brick

Stacks3

Followers12

Votes1

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks201

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Material-UI vs Mozilla Brick: What are the differences?

Developers describe Material-UI as "React components for faster and easier web development. Build your own design system, or start with Material Design". React components for faster and easier web development. Build your own design system, or start with Material Design. On the other hand, Mozilla Brick is detailed as "UI Components for Modern Web Apps". Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.

Material-UI and Mozilla Brick can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Material-UI and Mozilla Brick are both open source tools. Material-UI with 48.6K GitHub stars and 11K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Mozilla Brick with 3.05K GitHub stars and 229 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Mozilla Brick, Material-UI

Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k

Comments

Kabir

Nov 29, 2021

Review

I don't recommend that you use Vue but that is just my biased opinion for react against vue. If you want a better user experience, use Next.js server side rendering. You will need to use Web Assembly to compile your unity 3d game on the web. DO NOT use html, css and js for your game. I recommend you use a tailwind UI kit, Chakra UI or material UI.

16.2k views16.2k

Comments

Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mozilla Brick	Material-UI
Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.	Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.
-	Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 201	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 12	Followers 3.7K
Votes 1	Votes 445
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Inovative	Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table
Integrations
No integrations available	React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js

What are some alternatives to Mozilla Brick, Material-UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Material UI vs Mozilla Brick