StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Meteor vs Nuxt

Meteor vs Nuxt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.7K
Votes372

Meteor vs Nuxt: What are the differences?

  1. Server-side Rendering: One key difference between Meteor and Nuxt is that Nuxt provides built-in server-side rendering capabilities, allowing for better SEO and faster page load times, while Meteor primarily focuses on client-side rendering and real-time data updates.

  2. Data Management: Nuxt relies on Vuex for managing application state and data flow, offering a centralized store for all components, whereas Meteor comes with its own reactive data system called Minimongo, which enables real-time data synchronization between client and server.

  3. SSR and Code Splitting: Nuxt supports server-side rendering out of the box and also has a built-in feature for code splitting, optimizing the loading performance of web applications, whereas Meteor lacks built-in support for server-side rendering and requires additional configuration for code splitting.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Nuxt has a larger community and ecosystem with a variety of plugins and modules available for integration, making it easier to extend and customize applications, while Meteor has a more specialized community but with strong support for real-time web applications.

  5. File Structure and Convention: Nuxt follows a convention-based file structure where components, pages, and assets are organized in designated folders, promoting a more organized development approach, while Meteor allows more flexibility in file organization and naming conventions, which can be advantageous for complex projects with specific requirements.

  6. Deployment and Hosting: Nuxt applications are easily deployable on various platforms such as Vercel, Netlify, and AWS, with built-in support for static site generation, whereas Meteor applications require specific hosting environments like Galaxy or manual setup on servers, making deployment slightly more complex.

In Summary, Nuxt excels in server-side rendering, data management with Vuex, and code splitting features, while Meteor stands out with its specialized community, Minimongo data system, and flexible file organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Meteor, Nuxt.js

Carl-Erik
Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor
Meteor
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
Automatic transpilation and bundling; Hot module replacement; Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥; Static file serving; Configurable with a nuxt.config.js file; Custom layouts with the layouts/ directory; Middleware; Code splitting for every pages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
2.0K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
1.7K
Votes
372
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
Pros
  • 62
    SSR
  • 47
    Automatic routes
  • 33
    Middleware
  • 29
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Meteor, Nuxt.js?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot