StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Meteor vs React Navigation

Meteor vs React Navigation

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K
React Navigation
React Navigation
Stacks1.4K
Followers348
Votes1

Meteor vs React Navigation: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Meteor and React Navigation, there are distinctive differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usage in web development projects.

  1. Architecture: Meteor is a full-stack platform that combines front-end and back-end development in a single framework, providing a comprehensive solution for building web applications. On the other hand, React Navigation is primarily focused on handling navigation within React Native applications, offering a seamless way to manage navigational components.

  2. Community Support: Meteor has a strong and active community that contributes to the platform with various packages, extensions, and resources to support developers. React Navigation, being a part of the React Native ecosystem, relies on the vibrant React community for updates, fixes, and enhancements.

  3. Real-time Data: One of the key features of Meteor is its built-in support for real-time data synchronization, allowing for instant updates across connected clients without the need for additional configurations. React Navigation, being a navigation library, does not have the inherent capability for real-time data synchronization.

  4. Technology Stack: Meteor comes with its own JavaScript stack that includes MongoDB, Blaze, and Tracker, providing a seamless development environment with pre-integrated tools. React Navigation, on the other hand, integrates with React Native and relies on the components and libraries available within the React Native ecosystem.

  5. Scalability: Meteor is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale applications with ease, thanks to its efficient data synchronization mechanisms and seamless client-server communication. React Navigation, being a navigation library, focuses more on providing smooth and responsive navigation experiences within React Native applications rather than scalability concerns.

  6. Customization: Meteor offers a high degree of customization through packages, extensions, and a flexible architecture that allows developers to tailor their applications according to specific requirements. In contrast, React Navigation provides a set of predefined navigation components and patterns that can be customized to some extent but with limitations compared to the extensive customization options available in Meteor.

In Summary, when comparing Meteor and React Navigation, the key differences lie in their architecture, community support, real-time data capabilities, technology stack, scalability, and customization options, each catering to different aspects of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Meteor, React Navigation

Carl-Erik
Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Meteor
Meteor
React Navigation
React Navigation

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Start quickly with built-in navigators that deliver a seamless out-of-the box experience. Navigation views that deliver 60fps animations, and utilize native components to deliver a great look and feel.

Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
1.8K
Followers
348
Votes
1.7K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to Meteor, React Navigation?

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

Replit

Replit

It is a platform for creating and sharing software. You can write your code and host it all in the same place. It is also a place to learn how to code.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp